<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I&#8217;m For Newt, and Here&#8217;s Why.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: So Long and Thanks for All the Vision : The Sundries Shack</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-706816</link> <dc:creator>So Long and Thanks for All the Vision : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-706816</guid> <description>[...] I&#8217;m sorry to see him go. I won&#8217;t go into all the reasons I supported Newt (see here and here) except to say that, in answer this question, I am glad I did. I don&#8217;t think he ran [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m sorry to see him go. I won&#8217;t go into all the reasons I supported Newt (see here and here) except to say that, in answer this question, I am glad I did. I don&#8217;t think he ran [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Et-Tu Right Wing Blogosphere? &#171; Nice Deb</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-706075</link> <dc:creator>Et-Tu Right Wing Blogosphere? &#171; Nice Deb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:32:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-706075</guid> <description>[...] Jimmie Bise: I’m For Newt, and Here’s Why. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jimmie Bise: I’m For Newt, and Here’s Why. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vinny</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705911</link> <dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705911</guid> <description>Most likely a Ron Paul troll...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely a Ron Paul troll&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Newt Gingrich Judges Your Candidates Economic Plan &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705865</link> <dc:creator>Newt Gingrich Judges Your Candidates Economic Plan &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:07:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705865</guid> <description>[...] friend and colleague Jimmie Bise was lamenting the other day on the Twitters on how none of our candidates are talking aboot the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend and colleague Jimmie Bise was lamenting the other day on the Twitters on how none of our candidates are talking aboot the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Newt&#8217;s Middle Name Is &#8220;Leroy&#8221; (&#8220;Willard&#8221; Is A Rat Man) &#187;                      ♆ The Macho Response ♆</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705757</link> <dc:creator>Newt&#8217;s Middle Name Is &#8220;Leroy&#8221; (&#8220;Willard&#8221; Is A Rat Man) &#187;                      ♆ The Macho Response ♆</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:18:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705757</guid> <description>[...] takes politics seriously &#8211; and isn&#8217;t above being lampooned &#8211; but where it counts, would you challenge [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] takes politics seriously &#8211; and isn&#8217;t above being lampooned &#8211; but where it counts, would you challenge [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Year Like No Other: Gaining Wisdom to Choose &#8211; Choosing Newt &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705756</link> <dc:creator>The Year Like No Other: Gaining Wisdom to Choose &#8211; Choosing Newt &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705756</guid> <description>[...] at Jimmie Bise&#8217;s The Sundries Shack we have a reasoned endorsement of Newt Gingrich. Here&#8217;s a snippet: So I want a fighter and I’m willing to let a few things slide to get [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Jimmie Bise&#8217;s The Sundries Shack we have a reasoned endorsement of Newt Gingrich. Here&#8217;s a snippet: So I want a fighter and I’m willing to let a few things slide to get [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maggie@MaggiesNotebook</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705752</link> <dc:creator>Maggie@MaggiesNotebook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705752</guid> <description>Well said Jimmie. Your positions are my positions although I haven&#039;t endorsed anyone at this point. My pick has always been Santorum because I believe he can and would do all that you have laid out, but I do not believe he can be the candidate, and so I continue leaning to Newt.Your point about holding pols accountable is exactly what we have to do, but we will have less of a chance of doing so with Romney, in my opinion. He&#039;s a wall builder and has only now dared face Sunday news forums. I don&#039;t think he will care about We The People, knowing that he has the backing of the party fossils. You are right that we are where we are today because we have let our elected representatives bruise and bloody the Constitution. Maybe that will never happen again without a fight.I believe Newt has the fire in his belly - overweight and prone to cruising, nevertheless. I believe that this is his chance to make a lasting mark, and I think he &quot;gets&quot; the TeaParty attitude now of It&#039;s The Constitution Stupid.We held our noses and voted for McCain. Newt has opinions, ideas and speaks his mind, something McCain never did unless it was in support of a Democrat. I want to believe Newt. Very thoughtful post. I&#039;m linking this morning.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Jimmie. Your positions are my positions although I haven&#8217;t endorsed anyone at this point. My pick has always been Santorum because I believe he can and would do all that you have laid out, but I do not believe he can be the candidate, and so I continue leaning to Newt.</p><p>Your point about holding pols accountable is exactly what we have to do, but we will have less of a chance of doing so with Romney, in my opinion. He&#8217;s a wall builder and has only now dared face Sunday news forums. I don&#8217;t think he will care about We The People, knowing that he has the backing of the party fossils. You are right that we are where we are today because we have let our elected representatives bruise and bloody the Constitution. Maybe that will never happen again without a fight.</p><p>I believe Newt has the fire in his belly &#8211; overweight and prone to cruising, nevertheless. I believe that this is his chance to make a lasting mark, and I think he &#8220;gets&#8221; the TeaParty attitude now of It&#8217;s The Constitution Stupid.</p><p>We held our noses and voted for McCain. Newt has opinions, ideas and speaks his mind, something McCain never did unless it was in support of a Democrat. I want to believe Newt. Very thoughtful post. I&#8217;m linking this morning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/12/22/im-for-newt-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-705729</link> <dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=17532#comment-705729</guid> <description>Don&#039;t be absurd. Newt supported the &quot;individual mandate&quot; in the form that was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/20/how-a-conservative-think-tank-invented-the-individual-mandate/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;proposed by the Heritage Foundation against Hillarycare in 1993&lt;/a&gt;.The individual mandate in Obamacare bears little resemblance to that proposed and back by conservatives.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be absurd. Newt supported the &#8220;individual mandate&#8221; in the form that was <a
href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/20/how-a-conservative-think-tank-invented-the-individual-mandate/" rel="nofollow">proposed by the Heritage Foundation against Hillarycare in 1993</a>.</p><p>The individual mandate in Obamacare bears little resemblance to that proposed and back by conservatives.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-26 09:49:43 by W3 Total Cache -->
