Comments on: Left-Wing “Economist” Vanquishes Paul Ryan with Impeccable Logic and Liquor Breath, but Mostly with Liquor Breath http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/ Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004. Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Jimmiehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703942 Jimmie Sat, 06 Aug 2011 02:10:29 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703942 Heh. You think I'd be scared of a debate? Silly whatever the heck you are. Heh. You think I'd be scared of a debate? Silly whatever the heck you are.

]]> By: CCRNhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703941 CCRN Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:13:00 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703941 Come talk with me Jimmie. Lets have a face to face debate. Until then, your a coward hiding behind your computer. Better yet, lets go on TV and debate the realities of your hero Paul Ryan and his proposals. Come talk with me Jimmie. Lets have a face to face debate. Until then, your a coward hiding behind your computer. Better yet, lets go on TV and debate the realities of your hero Paul Ryan and his proposals.

]]> By: Jimmiehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703530 Jimmie Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:03:01 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703530 Was there some attempt at logic there? Was there some attempt at logic there?

]]> By: Mikeyhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703527 Mikey Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:59:49 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703527 Well, there is some hypocrisy there. It was a French wine. Shouldn't Mr. Free Markets Urber alles be avoiding that Socialist Country?? Well, there is some hypocrisy there. It was a French wine.
Shouldn't Mr. Free Markets Urber alles be avoiding that Socialist Country??

]]> By: bldhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703508 bld Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:52:30 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703508 Banshee: You too just miss the point. And taking a page from Jimmie's playbook, I refuse to "elevate by rhetoric for that." Oh, and thanks for the spelling correction. I'm pretty embarrassed, but I will take some solace (however tiny) that you made a similar "typo" in trying to correct my "typo." Banshee: You too just miss the point. And taking a page from Jimmie's playbook, I refuse to "elevate by rhetoric for that."

Oh, and thanks for the spelling correction. I'm pretty embarrassed, but I will take some solace (however tiny) that you made a similar "typo" in trying to correct my "typo."

]]> By: bansheehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703493 banshee Sat, 09 Jul 2011 23:11:31 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703493 Oh, and it's "ad hominem," not "ad hominem". Reading can be a profitable activity. Oh, and it's "ad hominem," not "ad hominem". Reading can be a profitable activity.

]]> By: bansheehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703492 banshee Sat, 09 Jul 2011 23:08:47 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703492 I can't afford expensive wine these days, but there was a time I could. People like Feinberg should realize how lucky they are and STHU. Feinberg doesn't get that most people don't hate people who are better off. If Feinberg (who is apparently richer than I am) wants to buy dinner for me and my family, we'd be happy to take her up on it. An expensive bottle or two of wine is nothing to,well, whine about from where I sit. At least Ryan works for a living. I can't afford expensive wine these days, but there was a time I could. People like Feinberg should realize how lucky they are and STHU. Feinberg doesn't get that most people don't hate people who are better off. If Feinberg (who is apparently richer than I am) wants to buy dinner for me and my family, we'd be happy to take her up on it. An expensive bottle or two of wine is nothing to,well, whine about from where I sit. At least Ryan works for a living.

]]> By: Jimmiehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/07/08/left-wing-economist-vanquishes-paul-ryan-with-impeccable-logic-and-liquor-breath-but-mostly-with-liquor-breath/comment-page-1/#comment-703489 Jimmie Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:35:00 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16313#comment-703489 Why would I respond intellectually to a story that has no intellectual merit? Paul Ryan, like the boozy "economist", can spend his money on whatever the heck he wants. It belongs to him. Accusation #1 -- gone. There is not a scrap of evidence the Ryan broke any ethics rules, or any other rules, for that matter. The TPM article admits that much explicitly after it dishonestly posits that he might have done so. Accusation #2 -- gone. Paul Ryan's plan does not do what you say it does. Any informed reading of his plan, or any informed reading of any of his explanations of his plan, prove that beyond reasonable question. Accusation #3 -- gone. So what's left? Left-wing puffery and outright lying. Am I'm supposed to elevate by rhetoric for that? No thanks. Why would I respond intellectually to a story that has no intellectual merit?

Paul Ryan, like the boozy “economist”, can spend his money on whatever the heck he wants. It belongs to him. Accusation #1 — gone.

There is not a scrap of evidence the Ryan broke any ethics rules, or any other rules, for that matter. The TPM article admits that much explicitly after it dishonestly posits that he might have done so. Accusation #2 — gone.

Paul Ryan’s plan does not do what you say it does. Any informed reading of his plan, or any informed reading of any of his explanations of his plan, prove that beyond reasonable question. Accusation #3 — gone.

So what’s left? Left-wing puffery and outright lying. Am I’m supposed to elevate by rhetoric for that? No thanks.

]]>