<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: No, Folks. Sarah Palin Does Not Have to Run.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Tutu</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703314</link> <dc:creator>Tutu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:15:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703314</guid> <description>She does not have to run but she will, for sure. She is rolling out her movie and her daughter has a tell-all book, they are running, running so fast to the bank! She has to run or else she will lost her media stock and the whole family finance is now falling on her and Bristol&#039;s shoulders. These two brave women, they are inspiring! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She does not have to run but she will, for sure. She is rolling out her movie and her daughter has a tell-all book, they are running, running so fast to the bank! She has to run or else she will lost her media stock and the whole family finance is now falling on her and Bristol&#039;s shoulders. These two brave women, they are inspiring!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703192</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703192</guid> <description>Show me the Constitutional provision that allows the President to limit the black-letter authority Congress has to set the budget. I&#039;m telling you, it&#039;s not there.
So who keeps a check on Congress? Why, none other than us. Voters. The American people. You know, the folks mentioned in the first three words of the Constitution.
My understanding is deep enough to be correct. Unlike you, I know when to stop digging. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show me the Constitutional provision that allows the President to limit the black-letter authority Congress has to set the budget. I&#039;m telling you, it&#039;s not there.</p><p>So who keeps a check on Congress? Why, none other than us. Voters. The American people. You know, the folks mentioned in the first three words of the Constitution.</p><p>My understanding is deep enough to be correct. Unlike you, I know when to stop digging.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @JoshASchaeffer</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703185</link> <dc:creator>@JoshASchaeffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:54:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703185</guid> <description>If God doesn&#039;t keep a check on Congress, nobody will, because your interpretation doesn&#039;t even let the President do so.  I&#039;m sad to say, you don&#039;t seem to understand the law of our land on any deep level, and Obama is counting on that. All the evil, predatory things Obama does are backed with legislation, which a future president has the leeway to repeat unless s/he follows his/her oath to the Constitution instead of the nonexistent oath to Congress. If Congress shall make no law... then the President shall execute no law... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If God doesn&#039;t keep a check on Congress, nobody will, because your interpretation doesn&#039;t even let the President do so.  I&#039;m sad to say, you don&#039;t seem to understand the law of our land on any deep level, and Obama is counting on that. All the evil, predatory things Obama does are backed with legislation, which a future president has the leeway to repeat unless s/he follows his/her oath to the Constitution instead of the nonexistent oath to Congress. If Congress shall make no law&#8230; then the President shall execute no law&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703184</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:33:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703184</guid> <description>The President spends what Congress allots -- no more and no less (within reasonable tolerances on the &quot;less&quot; end). It&#039;s worked that way as long as we&#039;ve had a Constitution and a President.You can go back and say &quot;but the founders talked about doing it other ways before that&quot; and that&#039;s fine as an academic exercise, but it&#039;s irrelevant to what the President can do right now or in 2012. The simple fact is that Congress sets the budget and that&#039;s what the budget is. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President spends what Congress allots &#8212; no more and no less (within reasonable tolerances on the &#8220;less&#8221; end). It&#8217;s worked that way as long as we&#8217;ve had a Constitution and a President.</p><p>You can go back and say &#8220;but the founders talked about doing it other ways before that&#8221; and that&#8217;s fine as an academic exercise, but it&#8217;s irrelevant to what the President can do right now or in 2012. The simple fact is that Congress sets the budget and that&#8217;s what the budget is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @JoshASchaeffer</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703177</link> <dc:creator>@JoshASchaeffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:54:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703177</guid> <description>That&#039;s what an executive does... it spends the money. If Congress spent the money, Congress would be the executive. All Congress does is authorize the spending. The only thing Congress ever can do legislatively is authorize or forbid. That&#039;s it.
The only kind of bill that threatens the President when it overrides a veto is one that diminishes his power. If a bill enhances his power against his will instead, he can just twiddle his thumbs. And Congress can threaten him with impeachment or wait for a successor who WILL exercise the new power.
I am guessing you have never read Madison&#039;s notes on the Philadelphia Convention, I think you&#039;re already out of your league. Just do that first and we&#039;ll continue this. The executive was formulated well before any brainstorming of a &quot;council of revision&quot; or, in later days, a veto power. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s what an executive does&#8230; it spends the money. If Congress spent the money, Congress would be the executive. All Congress does is authorize the spending. The only thing Congress ever can do legislatively is authorize or forbid. That&#039;s it.</p><p>The only kind of bill that threatens the President when it overrides a veto is one that diminishes his power. If a bill enhances his power against his will instead, he can just twiddle his thumbs. And Congress can threaten him with impeachment or wait for a successor who WILL exercise the new power.</p><p>I am guessing you have never read Madison&#039;s notes on the Philadelphia Convention, I think you&#039;re already out of your league. Just do that first and we&#039;ll continue this. The executive was formulated well before any brainstorming of a &quot;council of revision&quot; or, in later days, a veto power.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703176</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:40:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703176</guid> <description>No, I understand the rules well enough. The President does not spend money. That power was given exclusively to Congress by the Constitution. The President may veto a spending bill, but if Congress overrules it, he has no Constitutional power to prevent it.
FYI, the veto did not come &quot;after the fact&quot;. It was part of the Constitution as ratified and was first used by George Washington just a couple years after ratification. And yes, the separation of powers is one of the reasons a veto exists. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I understand the rules well enough. The President does not spend money. That power was given exclusively to Congress by the Constitution. The President may veto a spending bill, but if Congress overrules it, he has no Constitutional power to prevent it.</p><p>FYI, the veto did not come &quot;after the fact&quot;. It was part of the Constitution as ratified and was first used by George Washington just a couple years after ratification. And yes, the separation of powers is one of the reasons a veto exists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @JoshASchaeffer</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703175</link> <dc:creator>@JoshASchaeffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:29:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703175</guid> <description>I think you the author don&#039;t understand how executive power works under the Constitution. The President can single-handedly dismiss and overrule any subordinate AT HIS PLEASURE (otherwise, the clause that the executive power is vested in him was written in vain). If there is a deficit crisis, he has the power NOT to spend the total of what Congress permits him. Do you seriously believe the reason the architects of the Constitution separated the executive and legislative branches merely so that he would have the veto? The veto came after the fact. The Presidency was imbued with the power to resist by omission any unconstitutional or unjust laws. Otherwise what is his oath for? People don&#039;t look at this stuff with a critical mind AT ALL. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you the author don&#039;t understand how executive power works under the Constitution. The President can single-handedly dismiss and overrule any subordinate AT HIS PLEASURE (otherwise, the clause that the executive power is vested in him was written in vain). If there is a deficit crisis, he has the power NOT to spend the total of what Congress permits him. Do you seriously believe the reason the architects of the Constitution separated the executive and legislative branches merely so that he would have the veto? The veto came after the fact. The Presidency was imbued with the power to resist by omission any unconstitutional or unjust laws. Otherwise what is his oath for? People don&#039;t look at this stuff with a critical mind AT ALL.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/06/14/no-folks-sarah-palin-does-not-have-to-run/comment-page-1/#comment-703167</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=16140#comment-703167</guid> <description>I think she can win. Then again, I think most of the GOP candidates can win assuming we get behind them once the nomination is decided. You&#039;re right!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she can win. Then again, I think most of the GOP candidates can win assuming we get behind them once the nomination is decided. You&#8217;re right!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-26 04:59:32 by W3 Total Cache -->
