http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/30/clearing-the-browser-tabs-radtke-for-senate-saturday-edition/ Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004. Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/30/clearing-the-browser-tabs-radtke-for-senate-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-702535 chuckhansen Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:10:31 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15776#comment-702535 I think what no one realizes is that the Royal Wedding is EXACTLY the same thing as the NFL Draft: <a href="http://chuckhansen.com/?p=614" rel="nofollow">http://chuckhansen.com/?p=614</a> I think what no one realizes is that the Royal Wedding is EXACTLY the same thing as the NFL Draft: http://chuckhansen.com/?p=614

]]> http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/30/clearing-the-browser-tabs-radtke-for-senate-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-702534 Jimmie Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:18:28 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15776#comment-702534 The core principle, more or less, of progressive economic theory is that the experts do have far more knowledge than anyone else, enough to guide a complex economy reliably. In theory, that's a fine belief, but it never quite works out that way in application. The core principle, more or less, of progressive economic theory is that the experts do have far more knowledge than anyone else, enough to guide a complex economy reliably. In theory, that’s a fine belief, but it never quite works out that way in application.

]]> http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/30/clearing-the-browser-tabs-radtke-for-senate-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-702533 Mr. Science Guy Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:33:00 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15776#comment-702533 Soros argues that markets are inherently unstable, because the participants have imperfect knowledge. Let's grant that supposition for the sake of argument. How does it make sense to infer that government regulators will be able to drive the market toward stability...unless they somehow have the perfect knowledge that no other participant possesses? Soros argues that markets are inherently unstable, because the participants have imperfect knowledge. Let's grant that supposition for the sake of argument. How does it make sense to infer that government regulators will be able to drive the market toward stability…unless they somehow have the perfect knowledge that no other participant possesses?

]]>