<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Essay that Finally Killed the Church of Global Warming</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/14/the-essay-that-finally-killed-the-church-of-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/14/the-essay-that-finally-killed-the-church-of-global-warming/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Russell C</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/04/14/the-essay-that-finally-killed-the-church-of-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-702294</link> <dc:creator>Russell C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15655#comment-702294</guid> <description>Besides the basic premise (that human activity causes global warming) being open to question, there&#039;s one other facet that seems to have been false from the start:  that skeptic climate scientists were paid shills of big coal &amp; oil. There&#039;s a definite probability that if the mainstream media had listened those skeptic scientists instead of doing everything they could to marginalize them, then maybe we wouldn&#039;t even be discussing the subject 15 years later. Please see &quot;How an Enviro-Advocacy Group Propped Up Global Warming in the MSM&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-enviro-advocacy-group-propped-up-global-warming-in-the-msm-a-nov-2-election-connection/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the basic premise (that human activity causes global warming) being open to question, there&#039;s one other facet that seems to have been false from the start:  that skeptic climate scientists were paid shills of big coal &amp; oil. There&#039;s a definite probability that if the mainstream media had listened those skeptic scientists instead of doing everything they could to marginalize them, then maybe we wouldn&#039;t even be discussing the subject 15 years later. Please see &quot;How an Enviro-Advocacy Group Propped Up Global Warming in the MSM&quot; <a
href="http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-enviro-advocacy-group-propped-up-global-warming-in-the-msm-a-nov-2-election-connection/" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-" rel="nofollow">http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-</a>&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-26 04:12:14 by W3 Total Cache -->
