<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Clearing the Browser Tabs &#8211; Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700405</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:37:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700405</guid> <description>Don&#039;t say that too loudly! The History Channel might hear you. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#039;t say that too loudly! The History Channel might hear you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Science Guy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700401</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Science Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700401</guid> <description>For the record, the &#039;2012 apocalypse&#039; meme is based on a misinterpretation of the Mayan calendar. The date 12/21/12 is when the Mayan calendar rolls over--it&#039;s like Y2K in our calendar. And there will be a similar amount of doom caused by it...none. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, the &#039;2012 apocalypse&#039; meme is based on a misinterpretation of the Mayan calendar. The date 12/21/12 is when the Mayan calendar rolls over&#8211;it&#039;s like Y2K in our calendar. And there will be a similar amount of doom caused by it&#8230;none.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Science Guy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700326</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Science Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700326</guid> <description>The Betelgeuse article is a, ahem, stellar example of good science and bad science journalism. The scientist informs the press that his observations show Betelgeuse is on its last legs--no more than 100,000 years to go. Since the star is expected to act like this right up until the beginning of the explosion, and we don&#039;t have measurements from 10,000 years ago--or even 10 years ago-- that&#039;s really all there is to say; we could see it blow tomorrow, or it could take longer than the human species has existed. We do know something about the size the explosion will be, and the &quot;twin suns&quot; headline is decidedly over the top--when Betelgeuse goes, it will be brighter than Venus, but not as bright as the full moon. And that&#039;s about all the news there is. That&#039;s kind of exciting science, for geeks, but any drama beyond that is manufactured to make the story seem more exciting. The year 2012 was evidently never mentioned by the scientist....
Your point that we wouldn&#039;t know about an explosion for over 600 years is true, but irrelevant. Since we only have one planet to look from, we always time astronomical events based on when we see them, not when they actually happen. Because of relativity, when things &#039;actually happen&#039; is more complicated than it seems, hence the convention. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Betelgeuse article is a, ahem, stellar example of good science and bad science journalism. The scientist informs the press that his observations show Betelgeuse is on its last legs&#8211;no more than 100,000 years to go. Since the star is expected to act like this right up until the beginning of the explosion, and we don&#039;t have measurements from 10,000 years ago&#8211;or even 10 years ago&#8211; that&#039;s really all there is to say; we could see it blow tomorrow, or it could take longer than the human species has existed. We do know something about the size the explosion will be, and the &quot;twin suns&quot; headline is decidedly over the top&#8211;when Betelgeuse goes, it will be brighter than Venus, but not as bright as the full moon. And that&#039;s about all the news there is. That&#039;s kind of exciting science, for geeks, but any drama beyond that is manufactured to make the story seem more exciting. The year 2012 was evidently never mentioned by the scientist&#8230;.</p><p>Your point that we wouldn&#039;t know about an explosion for over 600 years is true, but irrelevant. Since we only have one planet to look from, we always time astronomical events based on when we see them, not when they actually happen. Because of relativity, when things &#039;actually happen&#039; is more complicated than it seems, hence the convention.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700310</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700310</guid> <description>Why would I? The guy inked a $40 million contract and he&#039;s on the top left-wing news network on television. Despite that, he couldn&#039;t pull in enough of an audience to beat Red Eye, which airs on Fox at 2 AM. Truth to power? Heck, he was the power, just not a very good power. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I? The guy inked a $40 million contract and he&#039;s on the top left-wing news network on television. Despite that, he couldn&#039;t pull in enough of an audience to beat Red Eye, which airs on Fox at 2 AM. Truth to power? Heck, he was the power, just not a very good power.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition &#124; Browser</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700308</link> <dc:creator>Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition &#124; Browser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700308</guid> <description>[...] post: Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged friday, hospital, saturday, strictly, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged friday, hospital, saturday, strictly, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Strad</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700307</link> <dc:creator>Strad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700307</guid> <description>I hope you post a &quot;speaking truth to power&quot; missive about Olbermann&#039;s firing (in the wake of right wing Comcast taking over) the way you did for Juan Williams. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you post a &quot;speaking truth to power&quot; missive about Olbermann&#039;s firing (in the wake of right wing Comcast taking over) the way you did for Juan Williams.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2011/01/22/clearing-the-browser-tabs-strictly-awesome-saturday-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-700303</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Clearing the Browser Tabs – Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=15013#comment-700303</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Collins and Jimmie, Matthew Newman. Matthew Newman said: RT @jimmiebjr: New Post: Clearing the Browser Tabs - Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition http://bit.ly/hOVewG [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Collins and Jimmie, Matthew Newman. Matthew Newman said: RT @jimmiebjr: New Post: Clearing the Browser Tabs &#8211; Strictly Awesome Saturday Edition <a
href="http://bit.ly/hOVewG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hOVewG</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-26 03:08:23 by W3 Total Cache -->
