O’Donnell: “I’m You”. Unless You’re a Witch, in Which Case, I’m Not You At All.

| October 5, 2010 | Comments (5)

Christine O’Donnell has finally spent some of that $2 million she raised since her primary victory for a slick, professional campaign ad. In it, she is calm, lovely, human, and absolutely, positively not in any way, shape or form, a witch.

At least that’s the headline from about a bazillion MSM outlets this morning (really!).

Here’s the ad. Tell me if you think the headlines are fair.

I’m not at all sure that it’s fair to make that one line the headline, but it’s understandable and sure as heck was predictable. A brain-addled cockatiel could have predicted that the same MSM outlets who had been riding O’Donnell’s years-old admission that she “dabbled” in witchcraft when she was a kid would jump on this like it was a fresh pony and they were late getting the mailbag to Dodge City. It’s sure as heck not the opening line I would have picked and it sucks what should have been a subtle but strong amount of energy out of the ad and puts the focus back on an issue that she needs to move past.

Stacy McCain loves her ad and suggests that it sends an entirely different message than the one I saw.

Forget the words. Just turn off the sound and look at it. The moment she flashes that first smile, the average person likes her. They can’t help it. It’s an autonomic response.

Whether “I like her” translates into “I want her to be Senator,” I can’t say. But we’ve recently elected a president whose chief politic assets are a resonant baritone voice and a vague resemblance to the Allstate man, so I think it unwise to underestimate the superficiality of voters in the Age of Image.

Eh, I’m not so sure. I watched the ad with the sound down and what I saw in the first five seconds was extreme discomfort. Look at her head-tilt and the way she struggles to smile. Look at her eyes. It almost looks like she wants to cry, which is not at all what you want to see in a candidate’s first campaign ad. She looks too young, too unsure of herself, and not ready for serious work. I could be wrong about that. It could be that her smile will carry her to victory, that her ad reveals just how electric and lovable she is. If it works, I’ll be happy because I’m not ready to see her opponent, who loves him some Socialism, in the Senate. I’m just not seeing that right now.

I do think that O’Donnell has an amazing amount of charisma. She’s lovely and a lot smarter than her critics reckon. I also think she has a pretty good sense of humor lurking under the surface that we’ve not really gotten to see in all the videos from her incredibly earnest television appearances in the past. It could be that the discomfort I saw was due to a stilted script and a very restrictive format that doesn’t suit her well. I would rather have seen her in a more relaxed setting where her charisma would be on better display with a script that could make use of the humor she has. Instead, her people decided to go with “serious adult”. It didn’t work (which isn’t necessarily bad. It wouldn’t work for me either).

Edited to add a couple more thoughts at the end.

Other Posts of Interest:

Tags: , ,

Category: The Republican Minority

About Jimmie: View author profile.

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. bandit says:

    So what's with the black dress?

  2. Jewells says:

    I liked it. She comes across as sincere and honest and throws the witch thing right back in their faces. I bet no one thought she would address that issue this way and it works.

  3. Weirddave says:

    Bit of a rocky start, but sincere, I think. Overall I give it a B+.

    'Course, I would have gone in a different direction I would have opened with a few seconds from this clip by Monty Python (or something quite like it),
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

    Then followed it up with a clip from the chorus of one of these music videos:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFEfmbAeEDY&ob
    or
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEmJ-VWPDM4&ob
    (Probably the former, it's less obscure.)

    And pan to O'Donnell standing in the foreground, stating her case. The videos continue to play behind her, muted. Throw in images that highlight all the ridiculous things being said about her NOT on the subject of Washington DC's governance. I'm not a script writer, but here's how I'd script it:

    *Crowd yelling "WITCH! BURN HER!" from Holy Grail*

    cut to:

    *Christina Amphlett singing "When I think about you, I touch myself"*

    Sound pots down to mute, camera pans to O'donnell in foreground, behind her, video continues playing muted images of witches, suggestive videos, etc..

    O'donnell: "Really Delaware? This is what my opponent wants to talk about? Really? America is in crisis. The unemployment rate is as near to 10% as makes no difference, in the past two years, spending ……**Whatever campaign points she wants to make quickly, 2 or 3 max**….., and Chris Coons wants to go to Washington so he can push for more of the same. Like you, I'm mad as hell, and when I get to Washington I'll do what you'd do to stop it. I'm Christine O'Donnell, and I approved this message., because when it comes to common sense fiscal policy, I'm you."

    Rough, but I could polish it up in about 20 minutes.

  4. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jimmie and Jimmie, Fingers Malloy. Fingers Malloy said: RT @jimmiebjr New blog post:: O'Donnell: "I'm You". Unless You're a Witch, in Which Case, I'm Not You At All. http://bit.ly/cfeXgD [...]

  5. Tami says:

    Bandit…REALLY? Surely you aren't suggesting that because she's wearing a black dress she's lying about not being a witch?!

    I may have thought Hillary a bit off her rocker when she began talking about having séances in the White House, but I surely didn't then begin to call her a witch. (and she's given me far bigger reasons to call her a witch than O'Donnell ever has!)

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE