<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Winning, But We Haven&#8217;t Won</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/comment-page-1/#comment-693753</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:40:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=13396#comment-693753</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jimmie, Jimmie, Dee aka Sadie Gray, LEANN SEEHUSEN, News Real Blog and others. News Real Blog said: HEADLINE: We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won: Share and Enjoy: http://tinyurl.com/2bl2zw8 #news #politics [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jimmie, Jimmie, Dee aka Sadie Gray, LEANN SEEHUSEN, News Real Blog and others. News Real Blog said: HEADLINE: We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won: Share and Enjoy: <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/2bl2zw8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2bl2zw8</a> #news #politics [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Meg</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/comment-page-1/#comment-693749</link> <dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:57:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=13396#comment-693749</guid> <description>Harry Mitchell in Arizona is trying desperately to run to the right, hiding any sign he&#039;s a Democrat in his TV ads but it&#039;s over. David Schweikert, the Republican challenger, is 12 points ahead of him, due to Miitchell&#039;s voting record which has been lockstep with Pelosi and the Obama administration. He voted for Obamacare, some of the TARP bailouts, and cardcheck. He doesn&#039;t support SB1070, which is even more popular in Arizona than it is in the rest of the country. He&#039;s ignored the nonstop Tea Party protests outside his office, he doesn&#8217;t represent his Republican-leaning district. He is completely bought and paid for by the unions  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://epaper.aztrib.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=RVZULzIwMDcvMDMvMTIjQXIwMzgwMQ==&amp;Mode=HTML&amp;L&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://epaper.aztrib.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=RVZULzIwMDcvMDMvMTIjQXIwMzgwMQ==&amp;Mode=HTML&amp;L&lt;/a&gt;
ocale=english-skin-custom) With early ballots going out in the mail in a couple of weeks, there is virtually no way Mitchell can catch up to Schweikert, there are too few undecided voters. The national Dems just announced they won&#039;t be spending any money on his race, and the AFL-CIO and other labor unions have also decided not to spend any money on Arizona Congressional races. Whereas the NRCC is pouring money into the race to help Schweikert, along with the Club for Growth and independent expenditure committees like the 60 Plus Association. Thanks to 60+, Schweikert has more TV ads playing now than Mitchell. I predict Schweikert wins by close to double digits. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Mitchell in Arizona is trying desperately to run to the right, hiding any sign he&#039;s a Democrat in his TV ads but it&#039;s over. David Schweikert, the Republican challenger, is 12 points ahead of him, due to Miitchell&#039;s voting record which has been lockstep with Pelosi and the Obama administration. He voted for Obamacare, some of the TARP bailouts, and cardcheck. He doesn&#039;t support SB1070, which is even more popular in Arizona than it is in the rest of the country. He&#039;s ignored the nonstop Tea Party protests outside his office, he doesn&rsquo;t represent his Republican-leaning district. He is completely bought and paid for by the unions <a
href="http://(http://epaper.aztrib.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=RVZULzIwMDcvMDMvMTIjQXIwMzgwMQ==&amp;Mode=HTML&amp;L" rel="nofollow">(</a><a
href="http://epaper.aztrib.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=RVZULzIwMDcvMDMvMTIjQXIwMzgwMQ==&#038;Mode=HTML&#038;L" rel="nofollow">http://epaper.aztrib.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=RVZULzIwMDcvMDMvMTIjQXIwMzgwMQ==&#038;Mode=HTML&#038;L</a><br
/> ocale=english-skin-custom) With early ballots going out in the mail in a couple of weeks, there is virtually no way Mitchell can catch up to Schweikert, there are too few undecided voters. The national Dems just announced they won&#039;t be spending any money on his race, and the AFL-CIO and other labor unions have also decided not to spend any money on Arizona Congressional races. Whereas the NRCC is pouring money into the race to help Schweikert, along with the Club for Growth and independent expenditure committees like the 60 Plus Association. Thanks to 60+, Schweikert has more TV ads playing now than Mitchell. I predict Schweikert wins by close to double digits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Some of the headlines you may have missed&#8230; &#171; Cubachi</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/comment-page-1/#comment-693736</link> <dc:creator>Some of the headlines you may have missed&#8230; &#171; Cubachi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=13396#comment-693736</guid> <description>[...] Sundries Shack: We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sundries Shack: We’re Winning, But We Haven’t Won [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Larry Sheldon</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/09/21/were-winning-but-we-havent-won/comment-page-1/#comment-693725</link> <dc:creator>Larry Sheldon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:35:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=13396#comment-693725</guid> <description>I think Glenn Beck is right.
We have won.
We just don&#039;t know how to accept that yet. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Glenn Beck is right.</p><p>We have won.</p><p>We just don&#039;t know how to accept that yet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 22:47:30 by W3 Total Cache -->
