<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: At Least I Saw the Happy Soap Opera Ending!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/05/24/at-least-i-saw-the-happy-soap-opera-ending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/05/24/at-least-i-saw-the-happy-soap-opera-ending/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: The Diarist</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/05/24/at-least-i-saw-the-happy-soap-opera-ending/comment-page-1/#comment-690320</link> <dc:creator>The Diarist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:43:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12575#comment-690320</guid> <description>I haven&#039;t seen a single episode of &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt;. I did, however, watch the entire J.J. Abrams series &lt;i&gt;Alias&lt;/i&gt;. The lessons I learned watching that series taught me not to get involved with Lost.
Now, I didn&#039;t watch when it began oh-so-many-years-ago because its time-slot interfered with another show I was watching at the time (in the days before DVR). But I had planned to catching up via DVD or marathon reruns. Except &lt;i&gt;Alias&lt;/i&gt; did to me what &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt; did to its fervent viewers.
&lt;i&gt;Alias&lt;/i&gt; was primarily an action series. But it was also a mystery series as well. Unfortunately, &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt; did not learn the lessons of its older sibling. Too many plot holes. Too many unresolved questions. Too many cast-asides. Yes, the major questions were answered. Yes, plot lines most important to the show were resolved. And, yes, the characters were the most important part of the story. But they weren&#039;t the only reason I watched. I was hooked by the questions and mysteries posed as well. To leave so many loose threads is unacceptable and flat-out lazy. But at least &lt;i&gt;Alias&lt;/i&gt; had the excuse of being rushed due to cancellation.
(An aside: While &lt;i&gt;BSG&lt;/i&gt; wrapped up all of the shows questions and mysteries, it did a ham-handed job of it. And that left a sour taste in my mouth as well.)
Look. I get it. You want to keep the audience guessing and on their toes. You want to get them emotionally and psychologically vested in your characters and story. But at some point, all questions should be answered. All threads should be neatly (and within the reasonable realm of possibility as pertaining to the show) tied up.
To be so sloppy in the final season &lt;b&gt;you knew was coming years in advance&lt;/b&gt; ... well, that just shows how &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt; you are as a story teller. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#039;t seen a single episode of <i>Lost</i>. I did, however, watch the entire J.J. Abrams series <i>Alias</i>. The lessons I learned watching that series taught me not to get involved with Lost.</p><p>Now, I didn&#039;t watch when it began oh-so-many-years-ago because its time-slot interfered with another show I was watching at the time (in the days before DVR). But I had planned to catching up via DVD or marathon reruns. Except <i>Alias</i> did to me what <i>Lost</i> did to its fervent viewers.</p><p><i>Alias</i> was primarily an action series. But it was also a mystery series as well. Unfortunately, <i>Lost</i> did not learn the lessons of its older sibling. Too many plot holes. Too many unresolved questions. Too many cast-asides. Yes, the major questions were answered. Yes, plot lines most important to the show were resolved. And, yes, the characters were the most important part of the story. But they weren&#039;t the only reason I watched. I was hooked by the questions and mysteries posed as well. To leave so many loose threads is unacceptable and flat-out lazy. But at least <i>Alias</i> had the excuse of being rushed due to cancellation.</p><p>(An aside: While <i>BSG</i> wrapped up all of the shows questions and mysteries, it did a ham-handed job of it. And that left a sour taste in my mouth as well.)</p><p>Look. I get it. You want to keep the audience guessing and on their toes. You want to get them emotionally and psychologically vested in your characters and story. But at some point, all questions should be answered. All threads should be neatly (and within the reasonable realm of possibility as pertaining to the show) tied up.</p><p>To be so sloppy in the final season <b>you knew was coming years in advance</b> &#8230; well, that just shows how <i>Lost</i> you are as a story teller.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Science Guy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/05/24/at-least-i-saw-the-happy-soap-opera-ending/comment-page-1/#comment-690319</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Science Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 09:11:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12575#comment-690319</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t watch the episode, so I can&#039;t be certain what particular scene made you mention &#039;jet airplane with a reverse gear&#039;...but, that said, jet engines do have the capability for reverse thrust. It&#039;s normally used for braking during landings, and it&#039;s less powerful than the forward thrust, but it can in fact move the plane backward from a standing start. (Planes are normally pushed back from the terminal by a special vehicle, because it&#039;s safer, quieter, and more efficient--but in an emergency a jet could back away under its own power.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#039;t watch the episode, so I can&#039;t be certain what particular scene made you mention &#039;jet airplane with a reverse gear&#039;&#8230;but, that said, jet engines do have the capability for reverse thrust. It&#039;s normally used for braking during landings, and it&#039;s less powerful than the forward thrust, but it can in fact move the plane backward from a standing start. (Planes are normally pushed back from the terminal by a special vehicle, because it&#039;s safer, quieter, and more efficient&#8211;but in an emergency a jet could back away under its own power.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Narnia Myth of Lost &#124; Cosmopolitan Conservative</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/05/24/at-least-i-saw-the-happy-soap-opera-ending/comment-page-1/#comment-690313</link> <dc:creator>The Narnia Myth of Lost &#124; Cosmopolitan Conservative</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 02:12:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12575#comment-690313</guid> <description>[...] today, I had a twitter debate whether or not Lost had a mythology. Jimmie, who admitted to not having ever watched an episode prior to the finale, which I have issues with*, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, I had a twitter debate whether or not Lost had a mythology. Jimmie, who admitted to not having ever watched an episode prior to the finale, which I have issues with*, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 19:10:33 by W3 Total Cache -->
