<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I Hope That Treaty Is Thick and Made of Lead. It&#8217;s Going to Need to Protect Us From A Lot</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-689679</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:07:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12232#comment-689679</guid> <description>Actually, the &quot;had Obama&#039;s number&quot; refers to the reasoning I posited before it and nothing at all to do with masculinity or the lack thereof.
You have a couple other errors in there as well (such as that our nuclear doctrine for the Soviet Union offered a myriad of options other than complete annihilation and what the fallout from our attack would do). I suggest you use the word &quot;idiot&quot; with more care to avoid splashback. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the &quot;had Obama&#039;s number&quot; refers to the reasoning I posited before it and nothing at all to do with masculinity or the lack thereof.</p><p>You have a couple other errors in there as well (such as that our nuclear doctrine for the Soviet Union offered a myriad of options other than complete annihilation and what the fallout from our attack would do). I suggest you use the word &quot;idiot&quot; with more care to avoid splashback.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ascastle</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-689672</link> <dc:creator>ascastle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:14:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12232#comment-689672</guid> <description>&quot;There is no doubt that Vladimir Putin, who was neck-deep in the Cold War as a member of the KGB when Barack Obama was a drug-using high school slacker, has his number.&quot;
Why is there no doubt that Putin &#039;has Obama&#039;s number&#039;?  Are you just assuming from all of those videos with his shirt off that Putin is a real man, capable of real man decisions - such as the mass murder of innocent civilians?  What did this change in Russo/US relations, exactly?  Nukes were never an actual solution to any problem we had with Russia - if we attacked them, we would have to wipe them out to avoid a counterattack, and the amount of fallout from the number of nukes required to wipe Russia out would poison the entire planet.
Do you think that people can now attack the US with impunity or something?  Are you just the most frightened person in the world, or the most daft?
&quot;Now, a nation may do whatever it wishes&quot; and only risk being annihilated by conventional weapons.  You&#039;re an idiot. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;There is no doubt that Vladimir Putin, who was neck-deep in the Cold War as a member of the KGB when Barack Obama was a drug-using high school slacker, has his number.&quot;</p><p>Why is there no doubt that Putin &#039;has Obama&#039;s number&#039;?  Are you just assuming from all of those videos with his shirt off that Putin is a real man, capable of real man decisions &#8211; such as the mass murder of innocent civilians?  What did this change in Russo/US relations, exactly?  Nukes were never an actual solution to any problem we had with Russia &#8211; if we attacked them, we would have to wipe them out to avoid a counterattack, and the amount of fallout from the number of nukes required to wipe Russia out would poison the entire planet.</p><p>Do you think that people can now attack the US with impunity or something?  Are you just the most frightened person in the world, or the most daft?</p><p>&quot;Now, a nation may do whatever it wishes&quot; and only risk being annihilated by conventional weapons.  You&#039;re an idiot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: salvage</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-689653</link> <dc:creator>salvage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:04:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12232#comment-689653</guid> <description>played a strategy board game in his life, but I just couldn&#8217;t. The President is dangerously naive
Um... so you think real life is like &quot;Risk&quot; or &quot;Stratego&quot; and you&#039;re making accusations of naivety?
Are you sure you&#039;re as smart as you think you are? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>played a strategy board game in his life, but I just couldn&rsquo;t. The President is dangerously naive</p><p>Um&#8230; so you think real life is like &quot;Risk&quot; or &quot;Stratego&quot; and you&#039;re making accusations of naivety?</p><p>Are you sure you&#039;re as smart as you think you are?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lonely Conservative</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2010/04/06/i-hope-that-treaty-is-thick-and-made-of-lead-its-going-to-need-to-protect-us-from-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-689650</link> <dc:creator>Lonely Conservative</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=12232#comment-689650</guid> <description>Scary, isn&#039;t it? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary, isn&#039;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 18:20:59 by W3 Total Cache -->
