By: Bob Belvedere

Bob Belvedere — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:52:24 +0000

Dead. Solid. Perfect. Quoted from and linked to at: PULLING SOMETHING OUT OF ONE'S ASS

By: Ric Locke

Ric Locke — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:58:57 +0000

Hmph. We've been talking all this time about Carter parallels. Boehlert does at least manage to point out that the Kennedy parallels are even stronger. The assassination pr0n is a sign of desperation, folks. Regards, Ric

By: Kent

Kent — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:41:57 +0000

If Oswald were alive today, he'd be our executive pay czar, or a CA congressman, or a Columbia U professor.

By: Ed Rasimus

Ed Rasimus — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:34:22 +0000

One would be hard pressed to call Dallas a "hotbed of conservatism" these days. Pick up the Dallas Morning News on any given day for evidence to the contrary. They've got all the municipal corruption that Chicago has, so don't talk down about Big D.

And wasn't Oswald a fellow-traveler?

Never mind…

By: csjd

csjd — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:18:20 +0000

I'm afraid that Boehlert's madcap revision of history goes far beyond his hope that uninformed American's will buy into his wacko theory. Anyone paying attention must have noted by now that as more Americans are rejecting Obama and his fondest policy desires, the issue of assassination is being raised with much greater frequency. The liberals' first line of attack was that if you reject the President and his policies, you must be a racist. That didn't improve Obama's poll numbers, as his negatives are on the rise and the Tea Parties are growing larger, so the liberals have moved on to the next step; i.e., if you reject the President and his policies, you must be a planner or supporter of his assassination. The lefty blogs are replete with this reckless talk, and in essence, that was exactly what Nancy Pelosi was referencing in her tearful recollection of San Francisco-style politics this week. I am beginning to wonder if many liberals are seeing that as Obama and his ability to enact the left's agenda are slipping away, the only way to gain political dominance is to hope that he is assassinated by some right-wing extremist, thus giving them a campaign issue in 2010. There is no other logical reason for the fixation that the left has on the death of this president. In deliberately misconstruing political opposition into personal animus and death wishes, the left is in the process of backing themselves into a rhetorical corner. There is no place to go from here except to carry out the deed themselves and blame it on the right as they have done with many issues in the past. (Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh and conservative talk radio for the Oklahoma City bombing.) I have heard not a single conservative express any desire to have this president harmed in anyway. The left cannot tolerate conservative confidence in defeating this administration politically, so they have to set-up the most heinous scenario possible to discredit an entire political philosophy. It is but another example that liberals/socialists place absolutely no value on human life and would rejoice in the sacrifice of one to achieve their political ends.

By: eddiebear

eddiebear — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:55:00 +0000

*sigh*