<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I Am Not A Lawyer, But I Have a Smart Lawyer Friend!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/09/17/i-am-not-a-lawyer-but-i-have-a-smart-lawyer-friend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/09/17/i-am-not-a-lawyer-but-i-have-a-smart-lawyer-friend/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/09/17/i-am-not-a-lawyer-but-i-have-a-smart-lawyer-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-686800</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10458#comment-686800</guid> <description>&quot;The College Politico looks nothing like them and, more importantly, acts nothing like them.&quot;
Umm, from a legal perspective, action in a literary context is not important in copyright cases.  What would be arguable here is that they would have copied the format.  In older cases, it would have been multiple consistent exact phrases.  Now, I really don&#039;t think it matters.  What are you really going to steal, anyway?  Want to steal Lucas&#039;s stuff?  The only company who can really produce it is Lucas.  I&#039;m not sure copyright protection is even a good idea.  I&#039;d like it for sure, but why do I deserve it? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The College Politico looks nothing like them and, more importantly, acts nothing like them.&quot;</p><p>Umm, from a legal perspective, action in a literary context is not important in copyright cases.  What would be arguable here is that they would have copied the format.  In older cases, it would have been multiple consistent exact phrases.  Now, I really don&#039;t think it matters.  What are you really going to steal, anyway?  Want to steal Lucas&#039;s stuff?  The only company who can really produce it is Lucas.  I&#039;m not sure copyright protection is even a good idea.  I&#039;d like it for sure, but why do I deserve it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: theCL</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/09/17/i-am-not-a-lawyer-but-i-have-a-smart-lawyer-friend/comment-page-1/#comment-686791</link> <dc:creator>theCL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10458#comment-686791</guid> <description>Politico is such a common word. I&#039;d be amazed if College Politico was found in breach of any law. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico is such a common word. I&#039;d be amazed if College Politico was found in breach of any law.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 17:21:28 by W3 Total Cache -->
