<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: You Just Know the Republican Party Will Screw this Up</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: The Libertarian Civil War Against the GOP Has Begun : The Pink Flamingo</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686762</link> <dc:creator>The Libertarian Civil War Against the GOP Has Begun : The Pink Flamingo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:56:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686762</guid> <description>[...] who is calling the shots on just which Republican is &#8220;Pure&#8221; and just who isn&#8217;t?  Case in point.  Lindsey is treated like dirt by conservatives who absolutely adore Fred Thompson.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who is calling the shots on just which Republican is &#8220;Pure&#8221; and just who isn&#8217;t?  Case in point.  Lindsey is treated like dirt by conservatives who absolutely adore Fred Thompson.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686408</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686408</guid> <description>And in 2004, his rating was a 92 (compared to an 82 in 2008), which means that he&#039;s slipped 2 1/2 votes to the Democratic side in just four years.
There&#039;s a clear trend that he&#039;s running away from conservative values (Bush judicial nomination compromises anyone? Justice Sotomayor?) and toward his own counsel. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in 2004, his rating was a 92 (compared to an 82 in 2008), which means that he&#039;s slipped 2 1/2 votes to the Democratic side in just four years.</p><p>There&#039;s a clear trend that he&#039;s running away from conservative values (Bush judicial nomination compromises anyone? Justice Sotomayor?) and toward his own counsel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SJ Reidhead</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686407</link> <dc:creator>SJ Reidhead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686407</guid> <description>Lindsey Graham has a life-time ACU rating of 90%.  I gather that is not conservative enough.  Funny thing, Fred Thompson&#039;s lifetime rating was just 87%.  Lindsey is more &quot;pure&quot; than Fred Thompson, but you don&#039;t slam him.
Strange, isn&#039;t it?
SJR
The Pink Flamingo </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindsey Graham has a life-time ACU rating of 90%.  I gather that is not conservative enough.  Funny thing, Fred Thompson&#039;s lifetime rating was just 87%.  Lindsey is more &quot;pure&quot; than Fred Thompson, but you don&#039;t slam him.</p><p>Strange, isn&#039;t it?</p><p>SJR</p><p>The Pink Flamingo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686365</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:35:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686365</guid> <description>I&#039;d use my first suggestion as a starting point. Limited government makes a political career in Washington less attractive.
I&#039;m still not sold on term limits. There&#039;s something to them that strikes me as a cop-out, to give us a reason to pay less attention to the people we elect. Still, passing them may end up being the only viable option we have. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d use my first suggestion as a starting point. Limited government makes a political career in Washington less attractive.</p><p>I&#039;m still not sold on term limits. There&#039;s something to them that strikes me as a cop-out, to give us a reason to pay less attention to the people we elect. Still, passing them may end up being the only viable option we have.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EricH</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686364</link> <dc:creator>EricH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686364</guid> <description>So that the chance to grasp the reins of power is the _only_ incentive to work in politics? Are you sure that&#039;s going to attract a better kind of candidate?
Better to impose term limits outright, I would think. State by state, if necessary. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that the chance to grasp the reins of power is the _only_ incentive to work in politics? Are you sure that&#039;s going to attract a better kind of candidate?</p><p>Better to impose term limits outright, I would think. State by state, if necessary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686359</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:09:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686359</guid> <description>It wouldn&#039;t be a bad idea if, while we were mucking the Congressional stables, we made sure they were a bit less amenable to a lengthy stay. I say a severe salary, benefit, and pension cut is in order. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#039;t be a bad idea if, while we were mucking the Congressional stables, we made sure they were a bit less amenable to a lengthy stay. I say a severe salary, benefit, and pension cut is in order.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smitty</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/08/31/you-just-know-the-republican-party-will-screw-this-up/comment-page-1/#comment-686354</link> <dc:creator>smitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=10160#comment-686354</guid> <description>Again, the systemic problem is that the Dems and GOP are a permanent, Progressive, political class.
Returning to any conservative, Federalist principles means that the alcoholic has to &quot;go cold turkey on the kickin&#039; chicken&quot; of power. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the systemic problem is that the Dems and GOP are a permanent, Progressive, political class.</p><p>Returning to any conservative, Federalist principles means that the alcoholic has to &quot;go cold turkey on the kickin&#039; chicken&quot; of power.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 16:40:44 by W3 Total Cache -->
