…For Varying Definitions of the Word “Beautiful”

| July 30, 2009 | Comments (2)

I dispute The Hill’s definition of the word “beautiful” so long as Maxine Waters is anywhere in the neighborhood of a “50 Most Beautiful” List. If you wanted to find a person more eaten up with anger and grievance, you’d have to get on a terrorist relief ship.

I also find it interesting that there’s one one Republican in the top ten and she’s leaving Washington in a month. Why, it’s almost like The Hill staff had a particular goal in mind or something. Heck, they passed over Ericka Andersen and she’s so busy around the Republican side of the House that they had to have tripped over her a few times to find the rest of the Top Ten. I have a hard time believing that they just didn’t notice her.

Perhaps next year they’ll make sure their ten most beautiful people are actually beautiful. it’d help if they looked on both sides of the aisle so they don’t have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to round out the list.

UPDATE: Yeah, the folks at The Hill are stone blind. Any of these women are top ten-worthy. And not one of them look like they’re ready to eviscerate someone at the drop of a hat.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

Other Posts of Interest:

Tags: , , ,

Category: Oh, THAT liberal media., Our New Democratic Overlords, The Republican Minority

About Jimmie: View author profile.

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. I think the typesetter made a mistake and it should read: The 50 Most Beautiful LOSERS

  2. [...] is the original post:  …For Varying Definitions of the Word “Beautiful” Tags: Ambinder, belvedere, class-ambinder, class-gates, Compatriots, gates, Hagiography, Media, [...]

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

 characters available
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE