<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Post Where I Dust off Old Grammar and Spanish Skills</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Adam Lanphier</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684353</link> <dc:creator>Adam Lanphier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684353</guid> <description>haha, i&#039;ll be damned; are we neighbors, jimmie? chevy chase circle here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, i&#039;ll be damned; are we neighbors, jimmie? chevy chase circle here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Lanphier</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684352</link> <dc:creator>Adam Lanphier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:52:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684352</guid> <description>you made the mistake twice; it wasn&#039;t a typo. if i were uncharitable, i&#039;d say it was a gap in your knowledge.
i went on to use context clues to figure out what you meant. likewise, sotomayor&#039;s examples clarify her meaning. the most damning thing you can say about her is her knowledge of spanish is colloquial. show me something that challenges her english; that&#039;s what she&#039;ll be wording legislature in, after all.
your strict requirements for her knowledge of spanish do beg the question, though: how many of the other sitting justices speak foreign languages? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you made the mistake twice; it wasn&#039;t a typo. if i were uncharitable, i&#039;d say it was a gap in your knowledge.</p><p>i went on to use context clues to figure out what you meant. likewise, sotomayor&#039;s examples clarify her meaning. the most damning thing you can say about her is her knowledge of spanish is colloquial. show me something that challenges her english; that&#039;s what she&#039;ll be wording legislature in, after all.</p><p>your strict requirements for her knowledge of spanish do beg the question, though: how many of the other sitting justices speak foreign languages?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684348</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:26:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684348</guid> <description>That&#039;s fine, but it is doesn&#039;t really help the discussion any. In order for a participle to function as an adjective, there have to &lt;em&gt;be&lt;/em&gt; adjectives.
As for your other venture into pedantry (affect vs effect), you&#039;re just being silly. You seem a smart guy, conflating a simple typo with not knowing an entire part of speech exists are remotely similar. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s fine, but it is doesn&#039;t really help the discussion any. In order for a participle to function as an adjective, there have to <em>be</em> adjectives.</p><p>As for your other venture into pedantry (affect vs effect), you&#039;re just being silly. You seem a smart guy, conflating a simple typo with not knowing an entire part of speech exists are remotely similar.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Lanphier</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684345</link> <dc:creator>Adam Lanphier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684345</guid> <description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spanishdict.com/translate/abierto&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.spanishdict.com/translate/abierto&lt;/a&gt;
participles may act as adjectives, but they are a different part of speech.
that is why &#039;adjective&#039; is listed second -- because it is a functional definition, not a classifying one.
the concept is explained here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.studyspanish.com/lessons/pastpart.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.studyspanish.com/lessons/pastpart.htm&lt;/a&gt;
i feel my grandfather&#039;s pedantry rising up in me </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a
href="http://www.spanishdict.com/translate/abierto" rel="nofollow">http://www.spanishdict.com/translate/abierto</a></p><p>participles may act as adjectives, but they are a different part of speech.</p><p>that is why &#039;adjective&#039; is listed second &#8212; because it is a functional definition, not a classifying one.</p><p>the concept is explained here:</p><p> <a
href="http://www.studyspanish.com/lessons/pastpart.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.studyspanish.com/lessons/pastpart.htm</a></p><p>i feel my grandfather&#039;s pedantry rising up in me</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684343</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684343</guid> <description>I can handle a routine factual error. I can&#039;t quite get past one that asserts that one&#039;s native language doesn&#039;t have a basic part of speech. That goes well past &quot;factual error&quot; into &quot;Whaaaaaa....?&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can handle a routine factual error. I can&#039;t quite get past one that asserts that one&#039;s native language doesn&#039;t have a basic part of speech. That goes well past &quot;factual error&quot; into &quot;Whaaaaaa&#8230;.?&quot;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684342</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684342</guid> <description>The dictionary claims it is an adjective, Adam. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dictionary claims it is an adjective, Adam.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Lanphier</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684341</link> <dc:creator>Adam Lanphier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:13:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684341</guid> <description>and i HATE that you&#039;ve dragged me down to this, but &#039;abierto&#039; is a participle, not an adjective. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i HATE that you&#039;ve dragged me down to this, but &#039;abierto&#039; is a participle, not an adjective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Lanphier</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/11/the-post-where-i-dust-off-old-grammar-and-spanish-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-684340</link> <dc:creator>Adam Lanphier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:10:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9145#comment-684340</guid> <description>so who would be your pick for justice?
a gentleman&#039;s bet: you name the man or woman more qualified than sotomayor, and i bet you i can find a factual error they&#039;ve made in the last two decades, using nothing more than the internet and my humble liberal-arts education. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so who would be your pick for justice?</p><p>a gentleman&#039;s bet: you name the man or woman more qualified than sotomayor, and i bet you i can find a factual error they&#039;ve made in the last two decades, using nothing more than the internet and my humble liberal-arts education.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 13:29:15 by W3 Total Cache -->
