<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Let Lawyers Run the Economy? Yeah, That&#8217;ll Go Well.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/08/let-lawyers-run-the-economy-yeah-thatll-go-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/08/let-lawyers-run-the-economy-yeah-thatll-go-well/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/06/08/let-lawyers-run-the-economy-yeah-thatll-go-well/comment-page-1/#comment-684254</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=9115#comment-684254</guid> <description>Funny you should mention that.  The Supreme Court just ruled that judges must recuse themselves when they accept campaign donations from the participants in the their cases.  As you&#039;d expect, the four in the 5-4 decision were the Justices you like.  So tell me Jimmie, do you believe, like the Justices you like, that the results of a court proceeding should be bought by the election your deciding voter?  And we&#039;re talking about a judge who had the highest campaign coffer in West Virginia history at $5 million.  And $3 million came from one source: the plaintiff in the case.  It&#039;s time to let judges be judges and not politicians.  The Supremes rules in favor of that day, but your judges opposed it.  Explain that to me, Jimmie. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention that.  The Supreme Court just ruled that judges must recuse themselves when they accept campaign donations from the participants in the their cases.  As you&#039;d expect, the four in the 5-4 decision were the Justices you like.  So tell me Jimmie, do you believe, like the Justices you like, that the results of a court proceeding should be bought by the election your deciding voter?  And we&#039;re talking about a judge who had the highest campaign coffer in West Virginia history at $5 million.  And $3 million came from one source: the plaintiff in the case.  It&#039;s time to let judges be judges and not politicians.  The Supremes rules in favor of that day, but your judges opposed it.  Explain that to me, Jimmie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 13:20:09 by W3 Total Cache -->
