Comments on: America is Getting Fed Up

By: Lynn

Lynn — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:56:39 +0000

Whoever believes what they hear/see on Gallup/Fox/CNN needs their head examined. There is no liberal vs. conservative in government. That's just an illusion for the sheeple. They will continue with the same agenda no matter who is Puppet in Chief (even if he's not a legal citizen!)

By: Jimmie

Jimmie — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:40:09 +0000

Yep, Tom, and all of his policies poll significantly lower.

Remember, it aint' the man. It's the ideology.

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:29:17 +0000

Oh wait, I forgot. All these polls are made up by the evil liberal media, which is secretly controlled by the evil George Soros.

Like all those lying polls that showed Barack HUSSEIN Obama beating John McCain last November. Man, did the lying liberal media have egg on their face November 5th!

Oh wait…

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:15:10 +0000

"America's getting fed up" huh?

I guess that explains Obama's plus sixty percent approval ratings on Gallup/Fox/CNN and just about every major polling industry, with a low-point of 58% on Rasmussen.

America getting fed up, my ass. Conservative tools are getting fed up that they keep losing.

By: Dave C

Dave C — Wed, 27 May 2009 09:49:03 +0000

Funny.. I typed in fostert and it was corrected to Fostard.

By: fostert

fostert — Wed, 27 May 2009 06:30:01 +0000

Where do I get your acid? I really like hallucinogens, but you obviously have better ones. And I was silly enough to think Owsley's* recipe was the best. Look at the polls, Americans aren't fed up if they give the president 70% approval. They are frustrated for sure, but not having a job kind of does that. But they still blame Bush for that. And for the reason that any economic policy takes about a year to take effect. Wait a little and see. Second Quarter numbers are already showing improvement. But let's be real, that could just be an anomaly. But compared to Bush's last quarter, well nothing could be that bad, so it's obviously better. But it's actually positive. Compared to radical collapse, that's good.

*What's disturbing is that if I type 'Owsley', I get Owsley Stanley, who was the person I was talking about. But he's not exactly someone who deserves immediate recognition. Although his chemical prowess is commendable. But I type in 'Obama', and it's considered a misspelled word. I'm not sure when the President of the United States of America became such an irrelevant office that the holder of the office would become a misspelled name. But I'm really sure it was when a Democrat was elected to that office. 'McCain' is already considered to be correctly spelled, and it has two capital letters in the same name. And 'Gingrich' and 'Cheney' are considered to be properly spelled for no reason at all. But the most powerful person in the world is considered to be misspelled. But Mozilla is a hardcore Republican company that cannot be swayed. They will always favor Republicans, just like the TV media. When the balance is two Republicans for every Democrat, it's hard to argue the "liberal media" crap. The previous argument was that the Republicans were in power so they should get the majority of coverage. Now the argument is that the Republicans are out of power, so they should get the majority of coverage so the people in power can't control the media. The only consistency is the idea the the Republicans always get the majority coverage in the media. So can you tell me where this mythical 'liberal media' exists? I'm hoping to dive for some buried treasure, and we're obviously talking about an ancient culture, right? So this mythical 'liberal media' must be some kind of ancient gold bearing culture that wasn't raped by the Catholic Church, right?

By: Obi's Sister

Obi's Sister — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:07:14 +0000

I knew.

By: smitty

smitty — Tue, 26 May 2009 06:07:40 +0000

Coming up on 1/8th of the way through this ordeal. Thank Gore for the tubey-webs, or I'd likely slip into some level of depression.