<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Carrie Prejean Were a Rich Democratic Donor, NOW Would Probably Defend Her</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/02/if-carrie-prejean-were-a-rich-democratic-donor-now-would-probably-defend-her/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/02/if-carrie-prejean-were-a-rich-democratic-donor-now-would-probably-defend-her/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Any Chance Carrie Prejean is a Democrat? &#171; The Rhetorican</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/02/if-carrie-prejean-were-a-rich-democratic-donor-now-would-probably-defend-her/comment-page-1/#comment-683600</link>
		<dc:creator>Any Chance Carrie Prejean is a Democrat? &#171; The Rhetorican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8766#comment-683600</guid>
		<description>[...] Any Chance Carrie Prejean is a&#160;Democrat? May 2, 2009 Posted by Jehuda in Uncategorized.  Tags: News, Politics trackback  Has anyone bothered to ask her?  Because her position on gay marriage is in agreement with that of such Democrat luminaries as &#8220;President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and the Presidential candidates trio of John Ed... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Any Chance Carrie Prejean is a&nbsp;Democrat? May 2, 2009 Posted by Jehuda in Uncategorized.  Tags: News, Politics trackback  Has anyone bothered to ask her?  Because her position on gay marriage is in agreement with that of such Democrat luminaries as &#8220;President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, and the Presidential candidates trio of John Ed&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-10 06:14:12 by W3 Total Cache -->
