<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: If the Left is Winning, Then Why is there Fear in Their Eyes?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Trouble</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683618</link> <dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:43:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683618</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;Maybe we&#8217;ll stop subsidizing the Red States. &lt;/i&gt;
We out here should be so lucky... as it would enable us to set our own tax and regulatory structures free from Federal greenmail.  After a few years of this, you could say bye bye to the NYSE and hello to the Omaha Stock Exchange.
Seriously though: the &#039;subsidies&#039; about which the moonbats prattle on are entirely attributable to military installations.  Nice try liberals; show work next time. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maybe we&rsquo;ll stop subsidizing the Red States. </i></p><p>We out here should be so lucky&#8230; as it would enable us to set our own tax and regulatory structures free from Federal greenmail.  After a few years of this, you could say bye bye to the NYSE and hello to the Omaha Stock Exchange.</p><p>Seriously though: the &#039;subsidies&#039; about which the moonbats prattle on are entirely attributable to military installations.  Nice try liberals; show work next time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Obi&#039;s Sister</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683591</link> <dc:creator>Obi&#039;s Sister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683591</guid> <description>Thanks for the link, Jimmie! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Jimmie!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683586</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683586</guid> <description>Hardly. Rasmussen is very clearly &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; measuring the President&#039;s approval. They are measuring a difference between strong approval and disapproval ratings. It&#039;s not hard to find their methodology on their site. To say otherwise is to stretch the point to breaking. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly. Rasmussen is very clearly <em>not</em> measuring the President&#039;s approval. They are measuring a difference between strong approval and disapproval ratings. It&#039;s not hard to find their methodology on their site. To say otherwise is to stretch the point to breaking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683585</link> <dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:40:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683585</guid> <description>&quot;measures Pres. Obama&#8217;s approval in single digits now&quot; is what I said, and carefully so.
I know that Rasmussen is doing this purposefully, and that it&#039;s no secret.  It&#039;s what people pay for.
It&#039;s also pretty clear that you know what I meant, so no, I didn&#039;t move anything. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;measures Pres. Obama&rsquo;s approval in single digits now&quot; is what I said, and carefully so.</p><p>I know that Rasmussen is doing this purposefully, and that it&#039;s no secret.  It&#039;s what people pay for.</p><p>It&#039;s also pretty clear that you know what I meant, so no, I didn&#039;t move anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683584</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:16:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683584</guid> <description>You want to break the scoop that Rasmussen is generally a conservative pollster? I&#039;m afraid you&#039;d be a few years late on that as you would on the scoop that Zogby is generally liberal.
The problem with your argument is that you still haven&#039;t shown me anyone who has said that the President&#039;s approval rating is in the single digits, which was your initial claim. You&#039;ve moved the goalpost nicely, though. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to break the scoop that Rasmussen is generally a conservative pollster? I&#039;m afraid you&#039;d be a few years late on that as you would on the scoop that Zogby is generally liberal.</p><p>The problem with your argument is that you still haven&#039;t shown me anyone who has said that the President&#039;s approval rating is in the single digits, which was your initial claim. You&#039;ve moved the goalpost nicely, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683583</link> <dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683583</guid> <description>So why the switch with Rasmussen between their Bush and Obama reporting ya think?
The gap between approve and disapprove using Rasmussen&#039;s numbers are more useless, and I might add deceptive, than with other polls because they separate the responses out into 4 categories.  If Rasmussen did  approve/disapporove like other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;polls&lt;/a&gt;, it at least would be at +9 instead of +1 but still a huge outlier. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why the switch with Rasmussen between their Bush and Obama reporting ya think?</p><p>The gap between approve and disapprove using Rasmussen&#039;s numbers are more useless, and I might add deceptive, than with other polls because they separate the responses out into 4 categories.  If Rasmussen did  approve/disapporove like other <a
href="http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm" rel="nofollow">polls</a>, it at least would be at +9 instead of +1 but still a huge outlier.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Worm is the word&#8230; &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683568</link> <dc:creator>Worm is the word&#8230; &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683568</guid> <description>[...] pointed in the direction to do so. Well apparently the Sundries Shack via the green room sees the same potential that Rush and I do: The thing is, the left hears the distant rumble of America’s real muscle and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pointed in the direction to do so. Well apparently the Sundries Shack via the green room sees the same potential that Rush and I do: The thing is, the left hears the distant rumble of America’s real muscle and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/05/01/if-the-left-is-winning-then-why-is-there-fear-in-their-eyes/comment-page-1/#comment-683581</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8761#comment-683581</guid> <description>You&#039;ve seriously never heard a news report about the gap between a pol&#039;s approval and disapproval numbers ever before? Never, ever? Hell, it was one of the stories of the Democratic primaries. If I heard one story about how the gap between Hillary&#039;s App/Disapp numbers was small and Obama&#039;s large, I heard a hundred. So Rasmussen has given it a more graceful name than &quot;Gap between ratings&quot;. Good on them. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;ve seriously never heard a news report about the gap between a pol&#039;s approval and disapproval numbers ever before? Never, ever? Hell, it was one of the stories of the Democratic primaries. If I heard one story about how the gap between Hillary&#039;s App/Disapp numbers was small and Obama&#039;s large, I heard a hundred. So Rasmussen has given it a more graceful name than &quot;Gap between ratings&quot;. Good on them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 12:21:07 by W3 Total Cache -->
