<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Obligatory Susan Boyle Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Diarist</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683374</link>
		<dc:creator>The Diarist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not overlooking that in the least, suek. In fact, that&#039;s my argument over the reaction she&#039;s now getting. People had lowered expectations of her based on her appearance and people are now overly praising her for exactly the same reason ... &quot;I never would have guess that such a voice could come from such a person&quot;. I see it all the time at the karaoke I host. 
 
There is a good tenor to her voice. It&#039;s pleasant on the ears. But she pushes her vibrato too hard; at least it sounds forced ... artificial ... to me. Her voice is middle-of-the-pack, small-stage-musical-theater good. But it&#039;s not international-morning-media good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not overlooking that in the least, suek. In fact, that&#039;s my argument over the reaction she&#039;s now getting. People had lowered expectations of her based on her appearance and people are now overly praising her for exactly the same reason &#8230; &quot;I never would have guess that such a voice could come from such a person&quot;. I see it all the time at the karaoke I host.</p>
<p>There is a good tenor to her voice. It&#039;s pleasant on the ears. But she pushes her vibrato too hard; at least it sounds forced &#8230; artificial &#8230; to me. Her voice is middle-of-the-pack, small-stage-musical-theater good. But it&#039;s not international-morning-media good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683370</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683370</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re both overlooking the real story here - which is people think your ability is related to your physical appearance.  Homely people are considered to be handicapped - simply because they&#039;re homely.   
 
People expected a less than stellar performance because of how she looks - they thought that they&#039;d just applaud politely.  Then they discovered that she was _good_...and that shocked them into overenthusiasm.  I do agree that as good as she is she probably isn&#039;t the absolutely most mostest singer on earth, but she _is_ good.  The problem is that if you listen to her and close your eyes, your brain visualizes a very pretty woman.  Then you open your eyes and it&#039;s a bit of a shock. 
 
It&#039;s a failing on our part - this linking of physical appearance and performance expectancy, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s likely to change. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re both overlooking the real story here &#8211; which is people think your ability is related to your physical appearance.  Homely people are considered to be handicapped &#8211; simply because they&#039;re homely.  </p>
<p>People expected a less than stellar performance because of how she looks &#8211; they thought that they&#039;d just applaud politely.  Then they discovered that she was _good_&#8230;and that shocked them into overenthusiasm.  I do agree that as good as she is she probably isn&#039;t the absolutely most mostest singer on earth, but she _is_ good.  The problem is that if you listen to her and close your eyes, your brain visualizes a very pretty woman.  Then you open your eyes and it&#039;s a bit of a shock.</p>
<p>It&#039;s a failing on our part &#8211; this linking of physical appearance and performance expectancy, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s likely to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily News About Susan Boyle : Best links about Susan Boyle of Tuesday, 21 April 2009 13:09</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683368</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily News About Susan Boyle : Best links about Susan Boyle of Tuesday, 21 April 2009 13:09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683368</guid>
		<description>[...] My Obligatory Susan Boyle Post : The Sundries Shack [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Obligatory Susan Boyle Post : The Sundries Shack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683369</guid>
		<description>On her singing voice, I certainly agree. She&#039;s good but not quite that good (certainly not as good as Paul Potts). But I won&#039;t quibble too badly if an otherwise good person gets a few more kudos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On her singing voice, I certainly agree. She&#039;s good but not quite that good (certainly not as good as Paul Potts). But I won&#039;t quibble too badly if an otherwise good person gets a few more kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Diarist</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683367</link>
		<dc:creator>The Diarist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683367</guid>
		<description>Praise for being a good person is all well and fine. There are far too many good people on this Earth who don&#039;t get the praise they deserve. But that&#039;s not what she&#039;s being praised for. She&#039;s being praised for her singing voice, which is fine but not praise-worthy. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Praise for being a good person is all well and fine. There are far too many good people on this Earth who don&#039;t get the praise they deserve. But that&#039;s not what she&#039;s being praised for. She&#039;s being praised for her singing voice, which is fine but not praise-worthy. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683364</guid>
		<description>I think she deserves the praise for being a damned good person. She shorted herself a lot of living to take care of her loved ones and has lived, by all accounts, a solid and uncomplaining life while doing so. That&#039;s worth some spotlight. That she can sing is icing on the cake. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she deserves the praise for being a damned good person. She shorted herself a lot of living to take care of her loved ones and has lived, by all accounts, a solid and uncomplaining life while doing so. That&#039;s worth some spotlight. That she can sing is icing on the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Diarist</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/20/my-obligatory-susan-boyle-post/comment-page-1/#comment-683363</link>
		<dc:creator>The Diarist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8589#comment-683363</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t think she&#039;s as amazing as many people think she is. She&#039;s good, yes. But she&#039;s not deserving of all of this praise and adulation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#039;t think she&#039;s as amazing as many people think she is. She&#039;s good, yes. But she&#039;s not deserving of all of this praise and adulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 21:10:23 by W3 Total Cache -->
