<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Beware the Knife in the Ribs, Conservatives.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/07/beware-the-knife-in-the-ribs-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/07/beware-the-knife-in-the-ribs-conservatives/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: suek</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/07/beware-the-knife-in-the-ribs-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-683191</link> <dc:creator>suek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:11:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8420#comment-683191</guid> <description>They targeted Rush, they&#039;ve targeted Hannity, they&#039;ve targeted Malkin - they _haven&#039;t_ targeted Charles.  Maybe there&#039;s a reason...! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They targeted Rush, they&#039;ve targeted Hannity, they&#039;ve targeted Malkin &#8211; they _haven&#039;t_ targeted Charles.  Maybe there&#039;s a reason&#8230;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/07/beware-the-knife-in-the-ribs-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-683186</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:30:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8420#comment-683186</guid> <description>He didn&#039;t truly claim that he couldn&#039;t because he hadn&#039;t actually tried. He had done some initial research, which led to his full attempt.
Charles is wrong about Beck because Charles is wrong about the initial assertions. You can&#039;t make a good point with bad information. It&#039;s dishonest. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#039;t truly claim that he couldn&#039;t because he hadn&#039;t actually tried. He had done some initial research, which led to his full attempt.</p><p>Charles is wrong about Beck because Charles is wrong about the initial assertions. You can&#039;t make a good point with bad information. It&#039;s dishonest.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brainster</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/04/07/beware-the-knife-in-the-ribs-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-683178</link> <dc:creator>Brainster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:27:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8420#comment-683178</guid> <description>If anything, Charles goes too easy on Beck; that whole bit about him debunking the FEMA concentration camps only came about because he first claimed he couldn&#039;t debunk them.
It&#039;s fine to oppose Obama; the spending is ridiculous. But I ain&#039;t marching in any parade that has Glenn Beck out in front. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, Charles goes too easy on Beck; that whole bit about him debunking the FEMA concentration camps only came about because he first claimed he couldn&#039;t debunk them.</p><p>It&#039;s fine to oppose Obama; the spending is ridiculous. But I ain&#039;t marching in any parade that has Glenn Beck out in front.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 11:02:47 by W3 Total Cache -->
