<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pelosi Says The GOP is Superfluous. She&#8217;ll Pass the Budget As-Is.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682973</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682973</guid> <description>I like the idea of bringing the milliard back into common use. It&#039;s a perfectly cromulent word! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of bringing the milliard back into common use. It&#039;s a perfectly cromulent word!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Science Guy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682971</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Science Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682971</guid> <description>The British equivalent of the American billion (one thousand million or 1,000,000,000) is a milliard. Though I&#039;m not sure the term is still in common use. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British equivalent of the American billion (one thousand million or 1,000,000,000) is a milliard. Though I&#039;m not sure the term is still in common use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Spinks</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682969</link> <dc:creator>Steve Spinks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682969</guid> <description>Not just in deference to them, but so that the average Joe (or Josephine) could get part of his/her brain around the size of the number! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just in deference to them, but so that the average Joe (or Josephine) could get part of his/her brain around the size of the number!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682964</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:24:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682964</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know if he still does it, but G. Gordon Liddy, on his radio show, would replace &quot;billion&quot; in the news stories he read with &quot;thousand million&quot; in deference to international listeners. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if he still does it, but G. Gordon Liddy, on his radio show, would replace &quot;billion&quot; in the news stories he read with &quot;thousand million&quot; in deference to international listeners.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: suek</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682962</link> <dc:creator>suek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682962</guid> <description>&gt;&gt;The American trillion is the same as the British billion: One million million, or 1,000,000,000,000.&gt;&gt;
Really.  That&#039;s definitely odd.  So...what would an Brit call an American billion?  You&#039;d think at least our number terminology would be the same...
Years ago, I had a discussion with a German woman about a &quot;pfund&quot;.  She said it was 500 grams, I said it was 454 grams.  After going through mental contortions about how a pound could weigh more in Germany than it did in the US, the obvious answer struck me - we translated &quot;pound&quot; as &quot;pfund&quot;, but a pound is a pound and a pfund is a pfund.  They may be linguistically the same but the numbers just simply don&#039;t equate.  That kind of misunderstanding in the basics of information gathering can lead to massive problems!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;The American trillion is the same as the British billion: One million million, or 1,000,000,000,000.&gt;&gt;</p><p>Really.  That&#039;s definitely odd.  So&#8230;what would an Brit call an American billion?  You&#039;d think at least our number terminology would be the same&#8230;</p><p>Years ago, I had a discussion with a German woman about a &quot;pfund&quot;.  She said it was 500 grams, I said it was 454 grams.  After going through mental contortions about how a pound could weigh more in Germany than it did in the US, the obvious answer struck me &#8211; we translated &quot;pound&quot; as &quot;pfund&quot;, but a pound is a pound and a pfund is a pfund.  They may be linguistically the same but the numbers just simply don&#039;t equate.  That kind of misunderstanding in the basics of information gathering can lead to massive problems!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Science Guy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682956</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Science Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:21:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682956</guid> <description>One thousand trillion is indeed a quadrillion. But in deference to international readers, English-speaking countries don&#039;t all count above millions the same way. The American trillion is the same as the British billion: One million million, or 1,000,000,000,000. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thousand trillion is indeed a quadrillion. But in deference to international readers, English-speaking countries don&#039;t all count above millions the same way. The American trillion is the same as the British billion: One million million, or 1,000,000,000,000.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682953</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682953</guid> <description>Geez. You&#039;re right. Consider that corrected. Don&#039;t know how I goofed on that number.
Our new project is to find out what comes after &quot;trillion&quot;. I think it&#039;s quadrillion, but I&#039;m only making an educated guess. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez. You&#039;re right. Consider that corrected. Don&#039;t know how I goofed on that number.</p><p>Our new project is to find out what comes after &quot;trillion&quot;. I think it&#039;s quadrillion, but I&#039;m only making an educated guess.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/26/pelosi-says-the-gop-is-superfluous-shell-pass-the-budget-as-is/comment-page-1/#comment-682952</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=8227#comment-682952</guid> <description>Trillion.  3.6 trillion.  Not billion, trillion.  Might as well start calling it a &quot;squintoodle&quot; because that is just as easily comprehended as a trillion. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trillion.  3.6 trillion.  Not billion, trillion.  Might as well start calling it a &quot;squintoodle&quot; because that is just as easily comprehended as a trillion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 10:29:36 by W3 Total Cache -->
