The real problem is the likelihood of their radicalizing other prisoners.

Well excerpt for the "small" little problem dealing with entering the U.S. court system I agree.

However, if you think for one hot second they would be "safe" there you, as Grandma used to say, you're off your rocker.

They wouldn't last 5 minutes during their first exposure to the general population. They'd be dead and just as quick the ACLU and various and sundry other loonbats would be in a tizzy claiming their "right" were violated.

And you haven't thus far because….???

Understand this: Ted is probably the smartest man on this planet. He's a really evil guy, but he's much smarter than the guys who put him in jail. His papers at Harvard were way beyond anything I could come up with. And I can come up with thoughts that would make your head spin. Ted is the smartest guy in his Supermax facility, but he's also smarter than anyone outside the facility. If he ever got loose, nobody could stop him. He only got caught because his brother knew who he was. But the next time, it will be different. That's why Ted needs to be kept in a federal prison until he dies. But the beautiful thing is this: we have prisons that can contain the smartest people in the world. Even they can't get out. So why should we be concerned about some jihadists? Those Islamic jihadists aren't even as good as the Tamil separatists. The Tamils invented all of the modern terrorist strategies. And Sri Lankan authorities are on the verge of destroying them completely. It's really too bad that Christians are so bad at anti- terrorism. Maybe you should ask the Buddhists. We're good at this kind of thing. The most dangerous terrorist force in history is about to go down. And it took a Buddhist country to do it. So tell me again how Christianity means something. When Christians can take down a smaller terrorist organization like Al Qeada, I'll give them the smaller credit they deserve.

So, Jimmie, explain to me why less dangerous criminals are more dangerous than more dangerous criminals. You have the special math to do such things, so bring it out.

The left is always focused on opportunities to increase their domestic power and controlling the culture, aka change. This is why the left wanted to lose the Iraq war. Their whole approach to the war on terror (or this recession) only makes sense once you understand that.

Never take them at their word. Remember how the fate of the Vietnamese – like the Iraqis – became irrelevant once they had served their purpose. And concerns about the "shredding of the constitution" are gone now that the right people are doing it.