<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Happy Birthday, President Reagan</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-679933</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:05:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7687#comment-679933</guid> <description>Yeah...right. Because that speech he gave in 1964 wasn&#039;t in any way straight-on conservative.
Or it could be that, even after reading my blog for as long as you have, you cling to your own cherished notions of what a conservative believes. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;right. Because that speech he gave in 1964 wasn&#039;t in any way straight-on conservative.</p><p>Or it could be that, even after reading my blog for as long as you have, you cling to your own cherished notions of what a conservative believes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-679932</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7687#comment-679932</guid> <description>If Reagan ran for president now, he&#039;d lose in the primary because he was too liberal.  Hell, Nixon would lose in a Democratic primary for being too liberal.  We have now reached the point where a Republican congressman speaks fondly of the Taliban.  No surprise there, the two organizations share a lot of common philosophy.  But this shift is insane.  Mussolini would be considered a moderate Republican now.  And I, a former Republican, am somehow considered a radical left wing lunatic now.  But if the Taliban is considered to be a good model for the Republican Party, then I&#039;m glad to be an independent. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Reagan ran for president now, he&#039;d lose in the primary because he was too liberal.  Hell, Nixon would lose in a Democratic primary for being too liberal.  We have now reached the point where a Republican congressman speaks fondly of the Taliban.  No surprise there, the two organizations share a lot of common philosophy.  But this shift is insane.  Mussolini would be considered a moderate Republican now.  And I, a former Republican, am somehow considered a radical left wing lunatic now.  But if the Taliban is considered to be a good model for the Republican Party, then I&#039;m glad to be an independent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 07:41:12 by W3 Total Cache -->
