<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Birthday, President Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-679933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7687#comment-679933</guid>
		<description>Yeah...right. Because that speech he gave in 1964 wasn&#039;t in any way straight-on conservative.  
 
Or it could be that, even after reading my blog for as long as you have, you cling to your own cherished notions of what a conservative believes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;right. Because that speech he gave in 1964 wasn&#039;t in any way straight-on conservative.  </p>
<p>Or it could be that, even after reading my blog for as long as you have, you cling to your own cherished notions of what a conservative believes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fostert</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/02/06/happy-birthday-president-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-679932</link>
		<dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7687#comment-679932</guid>
		<description>If Reagan ran for president now, he&#039;d lose in the primary because he was too liberal.  Hell, Nixon would lose in a Democratic primary for being too liberal.  We have now reached the point where a Republican congressman speaks fondly of the Taliban.  No surprise there, the two organizations share a lot of common philosophy.  But this shift is insane.  Mussolini would be considered a moderate Republican now.  And I, a former Republican, am somehow considered a radical left wing lunatic now.  But if the Taliban is considered to be a good model for the Republican Party, then I&#039;m glad to be an independent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Reagan ran for president now, he&#039;d lose in the primary because he was too liberal.  Hell, Nixon would lose in a Democratic primary for being too liberal.  We have now reached the point where a Republican congressman speaks fondly of the Taliban.  No surprise there, the two organizations share a lot of common philosophy.  But this shift is insane.  Mussolini would be considered a moderate Republican now.  And I, a former Republican, am somehow considered a radical left wing lunatic now.  But if the Taliban is considered to be a good model for the Republican Party, then I&#039;m glad to be an independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 21:40:06 by W3 Total Cache -->
