<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Senators, Please Think! Kill the Big Three Bailout Bill.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/12/11/senators-please-think-kill-the-big-three-bailout-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/12/11/senators-please-think-kill-the-big-three-bailout-bill/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/12/11/senators-please-think-kill-the-big-three-bailout-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-675024</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7015#comment-675024</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-674988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@suek&lt;/a&gt; -
The only reason I think it&#039;s really dead is because I don&#039;t see the UAW accepting Corker&#039;s condition that it accept pay parity. That&#039;s hardly a conservative suggestion from Corker, but I think it&#039;s enough to keep it dead. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="#comment-674988" rel="nofollow">@suek</a> &#8211;</p><p>The only reason I think it&#039;s really dead is because I don&#039;t see the UAW accepting Corker&#039;s condition that it accept pay parity. That&#039;s hardly a conservative suggestion from Corker, but I think it&#039;s enough to keep it dead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: suek</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/12/11/senators-please-think-kill-the-big-three-bailout-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-674988</link> <dc:creator>suek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:50:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=7015#comment-674988</guid> <description>I don&#039;t really disagree with you, but I disagree with you.  I don&#039;t think the bailout is dead dead dead...it may yet be revived.  For that reason alone, I&#039;m glad Corker&#039;s amendment is in there.  I&#039;d rather the bailout have a stake through its heart, but if that isn&#039;t accomplished, Corker&#039;s amendment might make a big difference.  It also may mean that the bailout will get that stake...the UAW doesn&#039;t want it with those terms, and that could make all the difference. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t really disagree with you, but I disagree with you.  I don&#039;t think the bailout is dead dead dead&#8230;it may yet be revived.  For that reason alone, I&#039;m glad Corker&#039;s amendment is in there.  I&#039;d rather the bailout have a stake through its heart, but if that isn&#039;t accomplished, Corker&#039;s amendment might make a big difference.  It also may mean that the bailout will get that stake&#8230;the UAW doesn&#039;t want it with those terms, and that could make all the difference.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 03:53:57 by W3 Total Cache -->
