<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Barack Obama &#8211; Bringing the Best of the Last Two Presidents?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/25/barack-obama-bring-the-best-of-the-last-two-presidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/25/barack-obama-bring-the-best-of-the-last-two-presidents/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/25/barack-obama-bring-the-best-of-the-last-two-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-673569</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6769#comment-673569</guid> <description>I&#039;d consider the &quot;walls&quot; foreign policy insofar as it involved fighting foreign enemies.
However, if you had to suck those up, but get another significant entitlement reform on the order of welfare reform, an economy on the upswing, relatively low taxes, and a federal government that grew less large than it did under President Bush, would you take it?
I would. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d consider the &quot;walls&quot; foreign policy insofar as it involved fighting foreign enemies.</p><p>However, if you had to suck those up, but get another significant entitlement reform on the order of welfare reform, an economy on the upswing, relatively low taxes, and a federal government that grew less large than it did under President Bush, would you take it?</p><p>I would.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TTFK</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/25/barack-obama-bring-the-best-of-the-last-two-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-673562</link> <dc:creator>TTFK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:18:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6769#comment-673562</guid> <description>This would be the same Clinton domestic policy which called the 1993 WTC bombing a &quot;police action&quot; and not a terrorist act.
This would be the same Clinton domestic policy that pushed through an &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban that proved completely useless.
This would be the same Clinton domestic policy that erected so many walls between intelligence agencies that they could not or would not share information, going so far as to miss multiple chances to grab Bin Laden.
Yeah, that&#039;s the kind of domestic policy I want! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be the same Clinton domestic policy which called the 1993 WTC bombing a &quot;police action&quot; and not a terrorist act.</p><p>This would be the same Clinton domestic policy that pushed through an &quot;assault weapons&quot; ban that proved completely useless.</p><p>This would be the same Clinton domestic policy that erected so many walls between intelligence agencies that they could not or would not share information, going so far as to miss multiple chances to grab Bin Laden.</p><p>Yeah, that&#039;s the kind of domestic policy I want!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 02:38:08 by W3 Total Cache -->
