<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not The Whole Reason Obama Was Elected, But It&#8217;s A Big Chunk</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/18/its-not-the-whole-reason-obama-was-elected-but-its-a-big-chunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/18/its-not-the-whole-reason-obama-was-elected-but-its-a-big-chunk/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Roy Mustang</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/18/its-not-the-whole-reason-obama-was-elected-but-its-a-big-chunk/comment-page-1/#comment-672871</link> <dc:creator>Roy Mustang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:25:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6663#comment-672871</guid> <description>America voted for an evil man just because he made us feel good about ourselves. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America voted for an evil man just because he made us feel good about ourselves.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/18/its-not-the-whole-reason-obama-was-elected-but-its-a-big-chunk/comment-page-1/#comment-672861</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6663#comment-672861</guid> <description>That&#039;s food for thought. I&#039;ve been doing a lot of pondering (nothing formed well enough to make a good blog post, though) about the election and what conservatives do from this point on.
The more I think about it, the more I believe that a good number of people who voted for the P-E did so not because they knew anything but the most superficial facts about him but for two reasons:
1) He wasn&#039;t one of old names we&#039;ve seen for the past ten years and he said he could bring something new and exciting to Washington.
2) He&#039;s black and, well, history, right?
It wasn&#039;t so much that these folks were voting for the best of the nation, because they quite obviously weren&#039;t. They were voting so they could feel good about themselves and if he happened to end up doing well, then bonus!
Republicans failed mightily by not overcoming Obama&#039;s novelty and his historicity (I think that&#039;s the word I want). They could have done it, but they didn&#039;t. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s food for thought. I&#039;ve been doing a lot of pondering (nothing formed well enough to make a good blog post, though) about the election and what conservatives do from this point on.</p><p>The more I think about it, the more I believe that a good number of people who voted for the P-E did so not because they knew anything but the most superficial facts about him but for two reasons:</p><p>1) He wasn&#039;t one of old names we&#039;ve seen for the past ten years and he said he could bring something new and exciting to Washington.</p><p>2) He&#039;s black and, well, history, right?</p><p>It wasn&#039;t so much that these folks were voting for the best of the nation, because they quite obviously weren&#039;t. They were voting so they could feel good about themselves and if he happened to end up doing well, then bonus!</p><p>Republicans failed mightily by not overcoming Obama&#039;s novelty and his historicity (I think that&#039;s the word I want). They could have done it, but they didn&#039;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cheesestick</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/11/18/its-not-the-whole-reason-obama-was-elected-but-its-a-big-chunk/comment-page-1/#comment-672859</link> <dc:creator>Cheesestick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6663#comment-672859</guid> <description>A non-political message board I&#039;m on all the time has a forum for people who homeschool their kids.  I was reading one of the threads in that forum a couple of days ago where the homeshoolers were defending their choice, saying that was the best option for their child &amp; how the public school systme is a failure, how it is no-body&#039;s business to tell them how to raise their child, etc.  Again, this is not a political message board at all.  (In fact, if you post anything political, the mods will delete it &amp; ban you.)  But they did allow people to use their candidate&#039;s picture or something like that as their avatar or in the signature.  Several of these people who were defending their home-schooling rights had Obama logos as their avatars.  I realized then that the Obama supporters really have no idea what he stands for or plans to do.  Sad.... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A non-political message board I&#039;m on all the time has a forum for people who homeschool their kids.  I was reading one of the threads in that forum a couple of days ago where the homeshoolers were defending their choice, saying that was the best option for their child &amp; how the public school systme is a failure, how it is no-body&#039;s business to tell them how to raise their child, etc.  Again, this is not a political message board at all.  (In fact, if you post anything political, the mods will delete it &amp; ban you.)  But they did allow people to use their candidate&#039;s picture or something like that as their avatar or in the signature.  Several of these people who were defending their home-schooling rights had Obama logos as their avatars.  I realized then that the Obama supporters really have no idea what he stands for or plans to do.  Sad&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 02:09:24 by W3 Total Cache -->
