What is a “civilian national security force” and to Whom Did Barack Obama Make that Promise?
By Jimmie on Nov 16, 2008 in Featured, President Barack Obama, The Rise of the Nanny State
So what exactly was Barack Obama talking about back in July?
Jim Treacher channels his inner Lewis Carroll and holds a dialogue between himself and an average member of the MSM Obama apologist. His little talk doesn’t lead to a particularly good place, but I don’t see where else Obama’s off the cuff campaign promise could lead.
Stumble it!
It usually comes down to the lefties insisting he was only talking about an expanded Peace Corps. OK, so why doesn’t he say “Peace Corps”? And why does the Peace Corps need to be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded” as the military?
I never get an answer to this because by now the lefty has been stumbling over himself in a desperate attempt to get away from where we are in the convo.
fireweed | Nov 17, 2008 | Reply
I’ve seen that same excuse and it’s the one that FactCheck.org used as well. The problem with that, as Treacher pointed out, is that no one could ever mistake the Peace Corps for a “security force”.
Jimmie | Nov 17, 2008 | Reply
Exactly.
Jimmie, I don’t know about you, but it makes me more than a little nervous that 52% of our voting population, who are supposedly more informed and enlightened than us, don’t ask these kind of questions.
Have we somehow been shoved through the looking glass?
fireweed | Nov 17, 2008 | Reply
I’m beginning to think that we’ve gone schizophrenic when it comes to the President-elect. On one hand, we don’t entirely take him at his word but on the other hand, we’re willing to ascribe near-superhuman abilities to him.
For instance, I saw a recent poll that showed over 70 percent of Americans believe that Barack Obama can fix the economy.
Jimmie | Nov 17, 2008 | Reply
I think a large portion of our population actually thinks it would be a good idea - having a “security force” to monitor & intervene in matters of fairness, justice and equality. Many are just uneducated in what that leads to and/or they have been pumped full of this silly notion that it is even possible to have a society that is free of insults, prejudice or any descrimination, real or imaginary. But whether they know what he meant by it or not, there really is no other explanation for them not even being the least bit curious…..
Cheesestick | Nov 18, 2008 | Reply