<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shockers: Most McCain MSM Coverage Has Been Negative.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:45:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Cheesestick</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-671254</link> <dc:creator>Cheesestick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:17:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6282#comment-671254</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.
This is not a shock to anyone not either currently in a coma or working for the news media.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Don&#039;t you think it is still a shock to McCain though? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.</p><p>This is not a shock to anyone not either currently in a coma or working for the news media.</p></blockquote><p>Don&#039;t you think it is still a shock to McCain though?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-25 00:16:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
