<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shockers: Most McCain MSM Coverage Has Been Negative.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheesestick</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/10/22/shockers-most-mccain-msm-coverage-has-been-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-671254</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheesestick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=6282#comment-671254</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.  
 
This is not a shock to anyone not either currently in a coma or working for the news media.  
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
Don&#039;t you think it is still a shock to McCain though? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket. </p>
<p>This is not a shock to anyone not either currently in a coma or working for the news media. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don&#039;t you think it is still a shock to McCain though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-10 04:19:53 by W3 Total Cache -->
