<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Judge Finds For &#8220;English Only&#8221; School, But That&#8217;s Not Necessarily a Good Thing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/08/16/judge-finds-for-english-only-school-but-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/08/16/judge-finds-for-english-only-school-but-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:45:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Lori</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/08/16/judge-finds-for-english-only-school-but-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-664604</link> <dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:44:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=5320#comment-664604</guid> <description>Arturo - Under what circumstance would they take your car? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arturo &#8211; Under what circumstance would they take your car?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arturo fernandez</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/08/16/judge-finds-for-english-only-school-but-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-664575</link> <dc:creator>arturo fernandez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=5320#comment-664575</guid> <description>And how about that new Denver legislation?  They can actually take your car if you have a drivers license and are a legal residence.  You can get it back if you can prove you&#039;re legal resident, at a cost of $2,500.00.  The extremists are taking us places that are very scary. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how about that new Denver legislation?  They can actually take your car if you have a drivers license and are a legal residence.  You can get it back if you can prove you&#039;re legal resident, at a cost of $2,500.00.  The extremists are taking us places that are very scary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: suek</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/08/16/judge-finds-for-english-only-school-but-thats-not-necessarily-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-664522</link> <dc:creator>suek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=5320#comment-664522</guid> <description>You know...this is a little problematic without knowing the background.
I went to a private Catholic school some 50 years ago.  We had girls there - in small numbers - who were from various South American countries.  They usually spoke no English when they came.  It had to be difficult for them...  They were not restricted from socializing with the other Spanish speaking girls, but there weren&#039;t very many of them.  No provision was made for them specifically to learn English(as far as I know), although the girls had help if they needed it.  By the end of their first year, most spoke decent English.  By the end of their second year, most spoke _good_ English.  None failed academic classes, though their grades weren&#039;t outstanding.
If there are a large number of Spanish speaking students, I can understand the school limiting their social interaction - the goal is to force them to learn English.  Given the lawsuit, chances are that they speak Spanish at home - the school may be trying to maximize the English exposure time, and to be honest, peer to peer interaction is probably the best way for kids to learn another language.
What confuses me is the parents...why are they sending their kids to this school if their goal isn&#039;t to learn English and to assimilate into American culture?  Wish we knew more about the parents and what they were up to... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230;this is a little problematic without knowing the background.</p><p>I went to a private Catholic school some 50 years ago.  We had girls there &#8211; in small numbers &#8211; who were from various South American countries.  They usually spoke no English when they came.  It had to be difficult for them&#8230;  They were not restricted from socializing with the other Spanish speaking girls, but there weren&#039;t very many of them.  No provision was made for them specifically to learn English(as far as I know), although the girls had help if they needed it.  By the end of their first year, most spoke decent English.  By the end of their second year, most spoke _good_ English.  None failed academic classes, though their grades weren&#039;t outstanding.</p><p>If there are a large number of Spanish speaking students, I can understand the school limiting their social interaction &#8211; the goal is to force them to learn English.  Given the lawsuit, chances are that they speak Spanish at home &#8211; the school may be trying to maximize the English exposure time, and to be honest, peer to peer interaction is probably the best way for kids to learn another language.</p><p>What confuses me is the parents&#8230;why are they sending their kids to this school if their goal isn&#039;t to learn English and to assimilate into American culture?  Wish we knew more about the parents and what they were up to&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 18:35:00 by W3 Total Cache -->
