<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;With A Capital &#8220;T&#8221; that Rhymes with &#8220;P&#8221; that Stands for PUMA!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-662482</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-662482</guid>
		<description>THE PUMAS ARE TOTALLY JUSTIFIED ... 
 
1. 	Contrary to what Obamabots say ... 
	Obama and Hillary were in a dead heat, 
	when the DNC pressured Hillary into not 
	only conceding, but campaigning for Obama. 
2. 	Obama is once again in a dead heat, but now 
	with McCain, even though Obamabots act like 
	Obama has already won (like they did in the 
	primaries against Hillary). So, this means that 
	half of the Democrats, and all the Republicans 
	(3/4 of America) dIdn&#039;t want Obama. Plus, he 
	didn&#039;t even win the popular vote, and refused a 
	revote in Michigan and Florida. 
3. 	Obama has the thinnest resume in politics, and 
	he won state legislature and Senator by 
	disqualifications of his opponents, not by earned 
	experience, or votes. 
4.	Obama&#039;s one claim to fame is being a community 
	organizer, where he boasts of registering voters. 
	Then he took their votes away from them, by 
	disqualifying his opponents on technicalities, prior 
	to the election. 
5.	Obama&#039;s mentor of 20 years, was an anti-American 
	racist ... not to mention other unsavory associations. 
6.	Obama is simply buying the election, since he&#039;s 
	good at fund raising ... hardly a qualification to be 
	President of the United States. 
7. 	The media never vetted Obama, and they are 
	giving him a free ride, plus more than twice the 
	print and air time as McCain, as they did against 
	Hillary. 
8. 	90% of blacks are voting for Obama, because he is 
	black, while the campaign gained ground by 
	accusing most opponents of racism. 
9.       Obamabots were, and are extremely nasty and sarcastic 
          towards Hillary supporters, as well as McCain supporters. 
10.     Pumas should be applauded for putting country before party ... 
           especially a party that did not represent them, and a party 
           which highjacked the nomination for Obama. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE PUMAS ARE TOTALLY JUSTIFIED &#8230;</p>
<p>1. 	Contrary to what Obamabots say &#8230;</p>
<p>	Obama and Hillary were in a dead heat,</p>
<p>	when the DNC pressured Hillary into not</p>
<p>	only conceding, but campaigning for Obama.</p>
<p>2. 	Obama is once again in a dead heat, but now</p>
<p>	with McCain, even though Obamabots act like</p>
<p>	Obama has already won (like they did in the</p>
<p>	primaries against Hillary). So, this means that</p>
<p>	half of the Democrats, and all the Republicans</p>
<p>	(3/4 of America) dIdn&#039;t want Obama. Plus, he</p>
<p>	didn&#039;t even win the popular vote, and refused a</p>
<p>	revote in Michigan and Florida.</p>
<p>3. 	Obama has the thinnest resume in politics, and</p>
<p>	he won state legislature and Senator by</p>
<p>	disqualifications of his opponents, not by earned</p>
<p>	experience, or votes.</p>
<p>4.	Obama&#039;s one claim to fame is being a community</p>
<p>	organizer, where he boasts of registering voters.</p>
<p>	Then he took their votes away from them, by</p>
<p>	disqualifying his opponents on technicalities, prior</p>
<p>	to the election.</p>
<p>5.	Obama&#039;s mentor of 20 years, was an anti-American</p>
<p>	racist &#8230; not to mention other unsavory associations.</p>
<p>6.	Obama is simply buying the election, since he&#039;s</p>
<p>	good at fund raising &#8230; hardly a qualification to be</p>
<p>	President of the United States.</p>
<p>7. 	The media never vetted Obama, and they are</p>
<p>	giving him a free ride, plus more than twice the</p>
<p>	print and air time as McCain, as they did against</p>
<p>	Hillary.</p>
<p>8. 	90% of blacks are voting for Obama, because he is</p>
<p>	black, while the campaign gained ground by</p>
<p>	accusing most opponents of racism.</p>
<p>9.       Obamabots were, and are extremely nasty and sarcastic</p>
<p>          towards Hillary supporters, as well as McCain supporters.</p>
<p>10.     Pumas should be applauded for putting country before party &#8230;</p>
<p>           especially a party that did not represent them, and a party</p>
<p>           which highjacked the nomination for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotwang</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-662061</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-662061</guid>
		<description>Alas, were Hillary to somehow take the nomination in Denver, she&#039;ll only have two months to woo back a significant bloc of disaffected Obama supporters, who are likely to be as moody and intractable as the PUMAs. Worse, it will hand the GOP a golden opportunity to paint the Dems as a party in disarray, panicked, fractious and desperately switching its candidate at the last minute. The public spectacle of shitcanning the much- ballyhooed presumptive candidate who drew swooning crowds, toured the Middle East and met with Europe&#039;s heads of state would become THE story of the general election, and a humiliation for the party that Hillary would have to carry, however bravely, to certain defeat. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, were Hillary to somehow take the nomination in Denver, she&#039;ll only have two months to woo back a significant bloc of disaffected Obama supporters, who are likely to be as moody and intractable as the PUMAs. Worse, it will hand the GOP a golden opportunity to paint the Dems as a party in disarray, panicked, fractious and desperately switching its candidate at the last minute. The public spectacle of shitcanning the much- ballyhooed presumptive candidate who drew swooning crowds, toured the Middle East and met with Europe&#039;s heads of state would become THE story of the general election, and a humiliation for the party that Hillary would have to carry, however bravely, to certain defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Srout</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-662055</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Srout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-662055</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton Supporters for John McCain  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hcsfjm.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hcsfjm.com&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton Supporters for John McCain<br />
  <a href="http://www.hcsfjm.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hcsfjm.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-661968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-661968</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s the nature of blogs sometimes that we all come in to it expecting a certain amount of confrontation. Sometimes that&#039;s not bad. 
 
I don&#039;t mind so much if there&#039;s a lot of blue on blue &quot;stole the election&quot; fallout. I think it would have the effect of showing the general public what a dysfunctional and oftentimes venomous nature lies in the heart of today&#039;s Democratic party. In the end, that would be good for Democrats as well, because it could well mean that more reasonable Democrats would have some firm support for purging the more traditionally progressive elements from among them. That would be a positive development for everyone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s the nature of blogs sometimes that we all come in to it expecting a certain amount of confrontation. Sometimes that&#039;s not bad.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t mind so much if there&#039;s a lot of blue on blue &quot;stole the election&quot; fallout. I think it would have the effect of showing the general public what a dysfunctional and oftentimes venomous nature lies in the heart of today&#039;s Democratic party. In the end, that would be good for Democrats as well, because it could well mean that more reasonable Democrats would have some firm support for purging the more traditionally progressive elements from among them. That would be a positive development for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-661966</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-661966</guid>
		<description>The perceived amount of &quot;Stole the election&quot; would be larger than anything we have seen in modern times. Much of it would not even be invalid.  
I agree it is more than just the old white women I stated earlier but there would be larger fall out for the dems than just the African-Americans for this election cycle. A large group of Obama&#039;s Elites and anti-war people would also fail to show up for Hillary.  
My main point is I think &quot;Stealing&quot; the election from Obama would have more far reaching fallout for the Democratic party that you do. I hope they do it.  
 
Besides I would prefer Hillary as President to Obama anyway. She is a known quantity with known ways to oppose her legislatively. Obama will be much harder to deal with on that front. 
 
Why do I end up arguing with you when I feel like I mostly agree with you? Anyway keep up the good work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The perceived amount of &quot;Stole the election&quot; would be larger than anything we have seen in modern times. Much of it would not even be invalid. </p>
<p>I agree it is more than just the old white women I stated earlier but there would be larger fall out for the dems than just the African-Americans for this election cycle. A large group of Obama&#039;s Elites and anti-war people would also fail to show up for Hillary. </p>
<p>My main point is I think &quot;Stealing&quot; the election from Obama would have more far reaching fallout for the Democratic party that you do. I hope they do it. </p>
<p>Besides I would prefer Hillary as President to Obama anyway. She is a known quantity with known ways to oppose her legislatively. Obama will be much harder to deal with on that front.</p>
<p>Why do I end up arguing with you when I feel like I mostly agree with you? Anyway keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-661963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-661963</guid>
		<description>Maybe, martin, but I really don&#039;t know. Blacks in the Democratic Party have pretty much gotten used to being an assumed part of the block of interests that form the party core.  
 
If there is some sort of ginormous turmoil at the convention and Obama doesn&#039;t win the nomination, there&#039;ll be some fuss but I expect that the Clinton folks have already considered that and are ready to co-opt the most vocal in the group to bring them into the fold. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, martin, but I really don&#039;t know. Blacks in the Democratic Party have pretty much gotten used to being an assumed part of the block of interests that form the party core. </p>
<p>If there is some sort of ginormous turmoil at the convention and Obama doesn&#039;t win the nomination, there&#039;ll be some fuss but I expect that the Clinton folks have already considered that and are ready to co-opt the most vocal in the group to bring them into the fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiamondTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-661957</link>
		<dc:creator>DiamondTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-661957</guid>
		<description>Martin, 
I respectfully disagree with your opinion. The MSM and DNC want everyone to believe this is just the &quot;old, white women&quot; block.  It isn&#039;t - it&#039;s everybody else. Men, asians, latinos...etc. 
 
Look at all the states that Clinton won after super tuesday without the &quot;black&quot; vote and how much she won that those states by. 
 
As for MI and FL, Obama blocked revotes in those states - what does that say? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>I respectfully disagree with your opinion. The MSM and DNC want everyone to believe this is just the &quot;old, white women&quot; block.  It isn&#039;t &#8211; it&#039;s everybody else. Men, asians, latinos&#8230;etc.</p>
<p>Look at all the states that Clinton won after super tuesday without the &quot;black&quot; vote and how much she won that those states by.</p>
<p>As for MI and FL, Obama blocked revotes in those states &#8211; what does that say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/20/with-a-capital-t-that-rhymes-with-p-that-stands-for-puma/comment-page-1/#comment-661954</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4915#comment-661954</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to disagree with DiamondTiger about Hillary&#039;s chances if nominated. If she is nominated now the African-American vote is going to be &quot;depressed&quot; (as in non-existent). With out 70%-80% of that vote no Democrat will win. That dynamic was already in place when Obama became the defacto nominee. I think the largest part of the &quot;super&quot; delegates have looked at this problem and determined that once lost the African-American vote as a near solid block could be gone forever, whereas the old white women vote is already somewhat fractured and most of the democratic part will come back. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m going to have to disagree with DiamondTiger about Hillary&#039;s chances if nominated. If she is nominated now the African-American vote is going to be &quot;depressed&quot; (as in non-existent). With out 70%-80% of that vote no Democrat will win. That dynamic was already in place when Obama became the defacto nominee. I think the largest part of the &quot;super&quot; delegates have looked at this problem and determined that once lost the African-American vote as a near solid block could be gone forever, whereas the old white women vote is already somewhat fractured and most of the democratic part will come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-10 03:14:08 by W3 Total Cache -->
