Comments on: The Global Warming Debate Part Deux: Monckton Strikes Back! http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/19/the-global-warming-debate-part-deux-monckton-strikes-back/ Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004. Thu, 24 May 2012 15:12:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ged Maheuxhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/19/the-global-warming-debate-part-deux-monckton-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-661890 Ged Maheux Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:55:52 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4910#comment-661890 Why are facts annoying? As Dan states, you put forth the *opinion* in your post is that the APS reversed it's scientific position on the issue of AGM, but as we know, they in fact, did not. Just because you want to believe they did, doesn't make it so. Be man enough to admit when you are wrong and correct the entry. You can cling to your beliefs and spout opinion in the issue (which is certainly your right to do), but don't make shit up. You owe your readers nothing less. Why are facts annoying? As Dan states, you put forth the *opinion* in your post is that the APS reversed it's scientific position on the issue of AGM, but as we know, they in fact, did not.

Just because you want to believe they did, doesn't make it so. Be man enough to admit when you are wrong and correct the entry. You can cling to your beliefs and spout opinion in the issue (which is certainly your right to do), but don't make shit up. You owe your readers nothing less.

]]> By: Jimmiehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/19/the-global-warming-debate-part-deux-monckton-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-661876 Jimmie Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:39:49 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4910#comment-661876 Man, you flat-earthers are annoying. Man, you flat-earthers are annoying.

]]> By: Danhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/07/19/the-global-warming-debate-part-deux-monckton-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-661868 Dan Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:51:50 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4910#comment-661868 The second line of your post is a complete untruth, as has been explained to you in the comments for your previous, Part 1 post. The second line of your post is a complete untruth, as has been explained to you in the comments for your previous, Part 1 post.

]]>