As for my prolific posting, I must say that you need to read more blogs. I post an average of perhaps four or five posts a day. That's well under the curve for most blogs attempting any sort of wide readership. Instapundit throws up at least a dozen a day. Michelle Malkin does six or seven. Hot Air does six. Patterico, GatewayPundit, LGF, Ace of Spades – all of them post more than I do and on the weekends I drop to half my output or worse. Most of the blogs on the left post more than me, too. I'm not even close to prolific.

However you missed my point entirely. I could say that any of my theories are true, though I don't know that any of them are and I suspect that the truth lies somewhere among all of them. My point was that any of my theories hold as much water as Chait's, based on what the original article said. Trying to divine a real finding out of that is impossible. My post was as tongue-in-cheek as his – perhaps even moreso. You should chill out a bit, man.

I resent that. My points are rarely silly. I'm happy to go mano a mano with you using rational argument backed up by good sources. You usually bluster or clam up at that point, almost never giving back in kind, instead just moving on to the next thing that pops up in your news/blog-feed.

You're the 3rd right-wing blog I have attached myself to, and by far the most intelligent, but you're still mostly wrong. But I respect you as a person, big boy.

"3) Conservatives, who are busy with lives and jobs and things like getting sunlight and meeting other human beings out in public, don’t have a lot of time at the computer"

You post prolifically, dude. I doubt you have a lady friend, or else you wouldn't be All Politics All the Time. Me, I work nights and sleep days, so it's really hard to find anyone to play with during the overnight hours when I tend to read/post (and usually only visit here once or twice a week).