<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The United States of&#8230;Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Put That Seal On Ebay, I Guess &#171; ChenZhen&#8217;s Chamber</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655834</link>
		<dc:creator>Put That Seal On Ebay, I Guess &#171; ChenZhen&#8217;s Chamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655834</guid>
		<description>[...] initial reaction, I left at Jimmie&#8217;s site: Obama is running for president. The blue seal is an advertising/PR gimmick, playing on the design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] initial reaction, I left at Jimmie&#8217;s site: Obama is running for president. The blue seal is an advertising/PR gimmick, playing on the design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tillerylakelady</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655751</link>
		<dc:creator>tillerylakelady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655751</guid>
		<description>Obama had only 146 days in office as a new senator. Democrats think that he is a uniter. A uniter of whom? As a 20 year member of a Anti- American church,ran by racist pastors,friends to Anti-Capital Leftists,married to a woman who is proud of her country only for the first time, and not willing to allow oil drilling right here right now. Whats wrong here? I am a registered Democrate but Obama scares me. No I WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama had only 146 days in office as a new senator. Democrats think that he is a uniter. A uniter of whom? As a 20 year member of a Anti- American church,ran by racist pastors,friends to Anti-Capital Leftists,married to a woman who is proud of her country only for the first time, and not willing to allow oil drilling right here right now. Whats wrong here? I am a registered Democrate but Obama scares me. No I WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655466</guid>
		<description>Because his theories are hardly discredited, man. We&#039;ve successfully used them here. &lt;em&gt;The Wealth of Nations&lt;/em&gt; is still a valuable book to read. I&#039;m not quite sure where you&#039;ve seen otherwise. 
 
Conservatives haven&#039;t run the economy for quite a while. But when we have, it&#039;s always been very strong. See Reagan and Kennedy for instructive examples. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because his theories are hardly discredited, man. We&#039;ve successfully used them here. <em>The Wealth of Nations</em> is still a valuable book to read. I&#039;m not quite sure where you&#039;ve seen otherwise.</p>
<p>Conservatives haven&#039;t run the economy for quite a while. But when we have, it&#039;s always been very strong. See Reagan and Kennedy for instructive examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fostert</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655457</link>
		<dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655457</guid>
		<description>Oh, and John Nash left Adam Smith in the dust long before you were even born.  Why you would cling to the obviously discredited theories of Smith is beyond me.  But I will grant you this: it is true that many conservatives still cling hopelessly to Smith&#039;s theories.  That&#039;s why they&#039;re so bad at managing the economy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and John Nash left Adam Smith in the dust long before you were even born.  Why you would cling to the obviously discredited theories of Smith is beyond me.  But I will grant you this: it is true that many conservatives still cling hopelessly to Smith&#039;s theories.  That&#039;s why they&#039;re so bad at managing the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fostert</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655455</link>
		<dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655455</guid>
		<description>&quot;Indeed, the general taxation struggle between conservatives and progressives is the essential battle between Smith and Keynes.&quot; 
 
No it&#039;s not.  On taxation issues, Democrats basically accept Laffer&#039;s theories while Republicans have moved on to the more comfortable tales told by the Tax Fairy.  Republicans now accept the notion that lowering taxes ALWAYS increases revenues.  Arthur Laffer demonstrated that such a notion is wrong.  Again, Mr Laffer made me become a Republican, and then he made me become a Democrat.  It all depends on which side of the curve we&#039;re on.  Now that we&#039;re on the left side of the curve, Republicans strongly reject Laffer&#039;s ideas.  And the Democrats now embrace them.  It&#039;s too bad that neither party has the nerve to genuinely accept theories unless they tell them what they want to hear. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Indeed, the general taxation struggle between conservatives and progressives is the essential battle between Smith and Keynes.&quot;</p>
<p>No it&#039;s not.  On taxation issues, Democrats basically accept Laffer&#039;s theories while Republicans have moved on to the more comfortable tales told by the Tax Fairy.  Republicans now accept the notion that lowering taxes ALWAYS increases revenues.  Arthur Laffer demonstrated that such a notion is wrong.  Again, Mr Laffer made me become a Republican, and then he made me become a Democrat.  It all depends on which side of the curve we&#039;re on.  Now that we&#039;re on the left side of the curve, Republicans strongly reject Laffer&#039;s ideas.  And the Democrats now embrace them.  It&#039;s too bad that neither party has the nerve to genuinely accept theories unless they tell them what they want to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655430</guid>
		<description>Chen, I&#039;m leery of anyone invoking that particular symbol, married to a set of policies that&#039;s a very small hop to the resurgence of what that symbol stood for. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chen, I&#039;m leery of anyone invoking that particular symbol, married to a set of policies that&#039;s a very small hop to the resurgence of what that symbol stood for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655429</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655429</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re really stretching economic theory, tom. Keynes and Smith overarching theories are still used today. Indeed, the general taxation struggle between conservatives and progressives is the essential battle between Smith and Keynes. My own take is that Keynes&#039; method is seriously flawed, but it&#039;s still used quite a lot today. 
 
And yes, Russia&#039;s government was, at heart, very fascist. Communism isn&#039;t a political structure. It&#039;s an economic system. Marxism, Nazism, and Italian Fascism are all branches of the same government control tree. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re really stretching economic theory, tom. Keynes and Smith overarching theories are still used today. Indeed, the general taxation struggle between conservatives and progressives is the essential battle between Smith and Keynes. My own take is that Keynes&#039; method is seriously flawed, but it&#039;s still used quite a lot today.</p>
<p>And yes, Russia&#039;s government was, at heart, very fascist. Communism isn&#039;t a political structure. It&#039;s an economic system. Marxism, Nazism, and Italian Fascism are all branches of the same government control tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChenZhen</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/21/the-united-states-ofobama/comment-page-1/#comment-655414</link>
		<dc:creator>ChenZhen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4702#comment-655414</guid>
		<description>OMG Jimmie this is quite a stretch.  I mean, of &lt;em&gt;course&lt;/em&gt; Obama was flirting with &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; blue eagle (even though it looks completely different), and not &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Eagles&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; blue eagles or, what the heck, even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kennedyhockey.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;. 
 
Obama is running for president.  The blue seal is an advertising/PR gimmick, playing on the design of the presidential seal.  Panties need not be twisted. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG Jimmie this is quite a stretch.  I mean, of <em>course</em> Obama was flirting with <em>that</em> blue eagle (even though it looks completely different), and not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Eagles" rel="nofollow">these</a> blue eagles or, what the heck, even <a href="http://www.kennedyhockey.org/" rel="nofollow">these</a>.</p>
<p>Obama is running for president.  The blue seal is an advertising/PR gimmick, playing on the design of the presidential seal.  Panties need not be twisted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 23:18:29 by W3 Total Cache -->
