<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Decides that He Doesn&#8217;t Need All His Heartfelt Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/19/barack-decides-that-he-doesnt-need-all-his-heartfelt-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/19/barack-decides-that-he-doesnt-need-all-his-heartfelt-principles/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: So, Where Are All Those Republican 527&#8217;s that Scared Obama into Breaking His Promise? &#124; The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/19/barack-decides-that-he-doesnt-need-all-his-heartfelt-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-654834</link>
		<dc:creator>So, Where Are All Those Republican 527&#8217;s that Scared Obama into Breaking His Promise? &#124; The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4697#comment-654834</guid>
		<description>[...] broke his promise to try really, really hard to make his campaign a publicly-funded affair, I noted that he invoked largely non-existent Republican 527 groups to justify himself. These are the bete noire of Democrats (even though they use them to the tune of hundreds of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] broke his promise to try really, really hard to make his campaign a publicly-funded affair, I noted that he invoked largely non-existent Republican 527 groups to justify himself. These are the bete noire of Democrats (even though they use them to the tune of hundreds of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/06/19/barack-decides-that-he-doesnt-need-all-his-heartfelt-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-654830</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4697#comment-654830</guid>
		<description>Every time I hear the Obamatons complaining about the Republicans&#039; 527s, the only one that comes to their mind is the Swift-boat group.  That was 4 years ago for Pete&#039;s sake.  They barely damaged Kerry - mostly it was just preaching to the choir.  Seriously, how many Dems do they think switched &amp; voted for Bush because of those ad&#039;s?  Everything was still nearly half &amp; half, just like it was in 2000.   
 
This year is so much different....what, with the Repub&#039;s candidate being a Democrat and the Dem&#039;s candidate being a faux messiah and all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I hear the Obamatons complaining about the Republicans&#039; 527s, the only one that comes to their mind is the Swift-boat group.  That was 4 years ago for Pete&#039;s sake.  They barely damaged Kerry &#8211; mostly it was just preaching to the choir.  Seriously, how many Dems do they think switched &amp; voted for Bush because of those ad&#039;s?  Everything was still nearly half &amp; half, just like it was in 2000.  </p>
<p>This year is so much different&#8230;.what, with the Repub&#039;s candidate being a Democrat and the Dem&#039;s candidate being a faux messiah and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-10 05:53:28 by W3 Total Cache -->
