<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How to Be A Harridan (Updated)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: spoots</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/comment-page-1/#comment-644268</link> <dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:54:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4387#comment-644268</guid> <description>J: &quot;a flawed &#8220;social&#8221; article on the division of labor in a home&quot;
Does it honestly strain anyone&#039;s credulity that &quot;women spent an average of 27 hours a week on housework in 2002, while men spent 16 hours&quot;?
What exactly are the study&#039;s methodological flaws?  I&#039;d be surprised to hear that you actually read it, never mind that you have a better grasp of statistics than academic social scientists. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J: &quot;a flawed &ldquo;social&rdquo; article on the division of labor in a home&quot;</p><p>Does it honestly strain anyone&#039;s credulity that &quot;women spent an average of 27 hours a week on housework in 2002, while men spent 16 hours&quot;?</p><p>What exactly are the study&#039;s methodological flaws?  I&#039;d be surprised to hear that you actually read it, never mind that you have a better grasp of statistics than academic social scientists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jewells</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/comment-page-1/#comment-644067</link> <dc:creator>Jewells</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:37:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4387#comment-644067</guid> <description>No spoots, there was no political content in the article.  I drew my own conclusion, based on what she wrote and my personal observations of democrat and republican wives.  The democrat wives tend to be bitter, self involved nags.  I speak from personal experience and that is my opinion. Sorry if you don&#039;t like it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No spoots, there was no political content in the article.  I drew my own conclusion, based on what she wrote and my personal observations of democrat and republican wives.  The democrat wives tend to be bitter, self involved nags.  I speak from personal experience and that is my opinion. Sorry if you don&#039;t like it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/comment-page-1/#comment-643886</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4387#comment-643886</guid> <description>I&#039;ll go out on a limb here and say that a woman who withholds sex from her husband in order to get him to do the chores she thinks he ought to do, who berates and embarrasses him in public, and who quotes a flawed &quot;social&quot; article on the division of labor in a home isn&#039;t a conservative. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll go out on a limb here and say that a woman who withholds sex from her husband in order to get him to do the chores she thinks he ought to do, who berates and embarrasses him in public, and who quotes a flawed &quot;social&quot; article on the division of labor in a home isn&#039;t a conservative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spoots</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/comment-page-1/#comment-643882</link> <dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4387#comment-643882</guid> <description>Jewells: &quot;What a condescending spoiled rotten little brat this woman is. Typical democrat.&quot;
I&#039;m sorry, was there some political content to this article that I missed? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jewells: &quot;What a condescending spoiled rotten little brat this woman is. Typical democrat.&quot;</p><p>I&#039;m sorry, was there some political content to this article that I missed?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jewells</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/04/21/how-to-be-a-harridan/comment-page-1/#comment-643762</link> <dc:creator>Jewells</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:45:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4387#comment-643762</guid> <description>If I pulled half the shit this woman does to her husband on my better half, he would just laugh at me and keep reading the sports section.  Seriously...isn&#039;t every good relationship a give and take?  What a condescending spoiled rotten little brat this woman is. Typical democrat. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I pulled half the shit this woman does to her husband on my better half, he would just laugh at me and keep reading the sports section.  Seriously&#8230;isn&#039;t every good relationship a give and take?  What a condescending spoiled rotten little brat this woman is. Typical democrat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 08:42:14 by W3 Total Cache -->
