<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Barbies and Bad Guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/16/on-barbies-and-bad-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/16/on-barbies-and-bad-guys/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lie of the Month and the Missing Mission of Obama&#8217;s Church : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/16/on-barbies-and-bad-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-633959</link>
		<dc:creator>Lie of the Month and the Missing Mission of Obama&#8217;s Church : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4204#comment-633959</guid>
		<description>[...] Times Political Caucus blog and RealClearPolitics! While you&#8217;re here, drop in a discussion of Barbies and Bad Guys, see who&#8217;s blaming Iran on whom, and see what happens when you&#8217;re responsible with your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times Political Caucus blog and RealClearPolitics! While you&#8217;re here, drop in a discussion of Barbies and Bad Guys, see who&#8217;s blaming Iran on whom, and see what happens when you&#8217;re responsible with your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/16/on-barbies-and-bad-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-633891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4204#comment-633891</guid>
		<description>Quite welcome! 
 
I&#039;m glad you didn&#039;t make it explicit. It left some room for me to say more than &quot;This guy nailed it all!&quot;. Have to leave some crumbs for bloggers like me, right? ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite welcome!</p>
<p>I&#039;m glad you didn&#039;t make it explicit. It left some room for me to say more than &quot;This guy nailed it all!&quot;. Have to leave some crumbs for bloggers like me, right? <img src='http://www.sundriesshack.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/16/on-barbies-and-bad-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-633888</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4204#comment-633888</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!  I would say in my own defense that pointing out that the NYT considers Barbie dolls a greater risk than another 9/11-scale attack is fairly explicit, though perhaps not as explicit as it could have been. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!  I would say in my own defense that pointing out that the NYT considers Barbie dolls a greater risk than another 9/11-scale attack is fairly explicit, though perhaps not as explicit as it could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 22:43:54 by W3 Total Cache -->
