<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Congress Votes to Spend More of Your Money on Their Perks and Treats</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: spoots</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-634329</link> <dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-634329</guid> <description>J: &quot;They weren&#8217;t equally against it.  There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#8217;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.&quot;
I think it was pretty clear that I was talking about the earmark amendment.
23 Republican Senators voted against earmarks, while 26 voted to keep wallowing in them.
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00075&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_l...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J: &quot;They weren&rsquo;t equally against it.  There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&rsquo;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.&quot;</p><p>I think it was pretty clear that I was talking about the earmark amendment.</p><p>23 Republican Senators voted against earmarks, while 26 voted to keep wallowing in them.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00075" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_l" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_l</a>&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633621</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633621</guid> <description>They weren&#039;t equally against it. There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#039;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.
the thing that stinks about being in power is that you&#039;re responsible for what gets passed. The Dems are on the hook for this.
Unless you&#039;re okay with saying that the Democrats are equally as responsible as Republicans for approving our taking down Saddam Hussein, or for the Patriot Act. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#039;t equally against it. There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#039;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.</p><p>the thing that stinks about being in power is that you&#039;re responsible for what gets passed. The Dems are on the hook for this.</p><p>Unless you&#039;re okay with saying that the Democrats are equally as responsible as Republicans for approving our taking down Saddam Hussein, or for the Patriot Act.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spoots</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633617</link> <dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:02:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633617</guid> <description>Republicans were equally against cutting back on earmarks.  Your phrasing implies that it was primarily a Democratic initiative. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans were equally against cutting back on earmarks.  Your phrasing implies that it was primarily a Democratic initiative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David M</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633534</link> <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633534</guid> <description>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - &lt;a href=&quot;http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/03/web-reconnaissance-for-03142008.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Web Reconnaissance for 03/14/2008 &lt;/a&gt; A short recon of what&#8217;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the &#8211; <a
href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/03/web-reconnaissance-for-03142008.html" rel="nofollow"> Web Reconnaissance for 03/14/2008 </a> A short recon of what&rsquo;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;so check back often.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 06:40:59 by W3 Total Cache -->
