<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Votes to Spend More of Your Money on Their Perks and Treats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spoots</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-634329</link>
		<dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-634329</guid>
		<description>J: &quot;They weren&#8217;t equally against it.  There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#8217;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.&quot; 
I think it was pretty clear that I was talking about the earmark amendment. 
23 Republican Senators voted against earmarks, while 26 voted to keep wallowing in them.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00075&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_l...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J: &quot;They weren&rsquo;t equally against it.  There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&rsquo;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.&quot;</p>
<p>I think it was pretty clear that I was talking about the earmark amendment.</p>
<p>23 Republican Senators voted against earmarks, while 26 voted to keep wallowing in them.<br />
  <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00075" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_l&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633621</guid>
		<description>They weren&#039;t equally against it. There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#039;t be a thing Republicans can do about it. 
 
the thing that stinks about being in power is that you&#039;re responsible for what gets passed. The Dems are on the hook for this. 
 
Unless you&#039;re okay with saying that the Democrats are equally as responsible as Republicans for approving our taking down Saddam Hussein, or for the Patriot Act. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#039;t equally against it. There are more Democrats in Congress than Republicans. If they wanted a smaller budget, there wouldn&#039;t be a thing Republicans can do about it.</p>
<p>the thing that stinks about being in power is that you&#039;re responsible for what gets passed. The Dems are on the hook for this.</p>
<p>Unless you&#039;re okay with saying that the Democrats are equally as responsible as Republicans for approving our taking down Saddam Hussein, or for the Patriot Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spoots</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633617</link>
		<dc:creator>spoots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633617</guid>
		<description>Republicans were equally against cutting back on earmarks.  Your phrasing implies that it was primarily a Democratic initiative. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans were equally against cutting back on earmarks.  Your phrasing implies that it was primarily a Democratic initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/03/14/congress-votes-to-spend-more-of-your-money-on-their-perks-and-treats/comment-page-1/#comment-633534</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4192#comment-633534</guid>
		<description>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - &lt;a href=&quot;http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/03/web-reconnaissance-for-03142008.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Web Reconnaissance for 03/14/2008 &lt;/a&gt; A short recon of what&#8217;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the &#8211; <a href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/03/web-reconnaissance-for-03142008.html" rel="nofollow"> Web Reconnaissance for 03/14/2008 </a> A short recon of what&rsquo;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;so check back often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-10 06:12:14 by W3 Total Cache -->
