Comments on: Seven New Deadly Sins? Not Quite.

By: spoots

spoots — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:19:28 +0000

You're quibbling, counting angels on a pin. There is no official list of sins per se. The reporting is fine.

By: Jimmie

Jimmie — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:25:42 +0000

Well, except that it's wrong, spoots, there are no problems. There are no new deadly since. There's no new doctrine. No story. Nada.

Jewells – I'd say that when the Monsignor was talking about the "obscenely rich", he was referring to them within the scope of greed. That is, being obscenely rich is a sin if your pursuit and possession of wealth causes you to neglect your basic duties as a responsible human and follower of Christ.

By: Jewells

Jewells — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:55:28 +0000

Uh define obscenely rich, and start working on your own house first. Freaking hypocritical asswipes. No wonder I don't go to church anymore.

By: spoots

spoots — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:45:03 +0000

J: "The reporting was mostly bunk"

The article to you link to at top doesn't seem to me to have any problems with it.