<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: RIP William F. Buckley, Jr.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-624062</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-624062</guid> <description>Honestly, I&#039;ve felt closer to him now than ever.  I really do miss him.  Aside from the Panama Canal and the legalization of marijuana, I rarely agreed with him.  But I always valued his view.  Sadly, I don&#039;t see anyone replacing him.  But who really can?
As for your knowing more about both sides after watching the show, that was really the point, wasn&#039;t it?  He felt that his views were right, so it didn&#039;t harm him to allow an alternate view.  Aside from his interview with Timothy Leary, he was the paragon of politeness and civilized debate.  But Tim probably deserved it.  Tim&#039;s cohort certainly thought so: &quot;when you get the message, it&#039;s time to hang up the phone&quot;.  But even the Leary interview gave Tim a fair chance to defend himself.  Which he didn&#039;t at the time.  Ultimately, Tim would get the last laugh, being a high paid consultant in Japan (and making more money than Bill).  But Buckley will really get the last laugh, having affected society to a greater extent.  In the end, I&#039;m divided on which was both better and worse for us.  Leary had the greater economic impact (positive), while Buckley had the greater political impact (mixed).  But Leary&#039;s impact is indirect, while Buckley was always respected at the highest levels. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#039;ve felt closer to him now than ever.  I really do miss him.  Aside from the Panama Canal and the legalization of marijuana, I rarely agreed with him.  But I always valued his view.  Sadly, I don&#039;t see anyone replacing him.  But who really can?</p><p>As for your knowing more about both sides after watching the show, that was really the point, wasn&#039;t it?  He felt that his views were right, so it didn&#039;t harm him to allow an alternate view.  Aside from his interview with Timothy Leary, he was the paragon of politeness and civilized debate.  But Tim probably deserved it.  Tim&#039;s cohort certainly thought so: &quot;when you get the message, it&#039;s time to hang up the phone&quot;.  But even the Leary interview gave Tim a fair chance to defend himself.  Which he didn&#039;t at the time.  Ultimately, Tim would get the last laugh, being a high paid consultant in Japan (and making more money than Bill).  But Buckley will really get the last laugh, having affected society to a greater extent.  In the end, I&#039;m divided on which was both better and worse for us.  Leary had the greater economic impact (positive), while Buckley had the greater political impact (mixed).  But Leary&#039;s impact is indirect, while Buckley was always respected at the highest levels.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-624015</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:40:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-624015</guid> <description>It doesn&#039;t surprise me at all. If I may make a poor analogy (at least on my part), I see you much as the Michael Kinsley to my woefully inadequate Buckley here.
One of the things I remember most about the show is that I almost always knew more about both sides of the discussion after the show than I did before. You reminded me of that with your comment.
I can still recall the theme song to mind without any effort at all. I suppose it has made a larger impression on me than I had thought. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#039;t surprise me at all. If I may make a poor analogy (at least on my part), I see you much as the Michael Kinsley to my woefully inadequate Buckley here.</p><p>One of the things I remember most about the show is that I almost always knew more about both sides of the discussion after the show than I did before. You reminded me of that with your comment.</p><p>I can still recall the theme song to mind without any effort at all. I suppose it has made a larger impression on me than I had thought.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-623989</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:16:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-623989</guid> <description>It might surprise you that I still defend my belief that that &quot;Firing Line&quot; was the best political talk show in history.  I probably remember watching 70% of the shows.  I was too young to remember the earlier shows, but I can assure you that I was on my mother&#039;s lap watching the show.  And she was a committed and activist liberal.  Her husband was a Rockefeller Republican, and her father-in-law was the local leader of the John Birch Society.  Often, they&#039;d watch Firing Line together and debate, politely of course, the topics discussed.  That Buckley&#039;s show could could manage to inspire civil debate among this crowd is truly amazing.  But it did. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might surprise you that I still defend my belief that that &quot;Firing Line&quot; was the best political talk show in history.  I probably remember watching 70% of the shows.  I was too young to remember the earlier shows, but I can assure you that I was on my mother&#039;s lap watching the show.  And she was a committed and activist liberal.  Her husband was a Rockefeller Republican, and her father-in-law was the local leader of the John Birch Society.  Often, they&#039;d watch Firing Line together and debate, politely of course, the topics discussed.  That Buckley&#039;s show could could manage to inspire civil debate among this crowd is truly amazing.  But it did.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 06:16:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
