<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIP William F. Buckley, Jr.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fostert</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-624062</link>
		<dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-624062</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;ve felt closer to him now than ever.  I really do miss him.  Aside from the Panama Canal and the legalization of marijuana, I rarely agreed with him.  But I always valued his view.  Sadly, I don&#039;t see anyone replacing him.  But who really can?  
 
As for your knowing more about both sides after watching the show, that was really the point, wasn&#039;t it?  He felt that his views were right, so it didn&#039;t harm him to allow an alternate view.  Aside from his interview with Timothy Leary, he was the paragon of politeness and civilized debate.  But Tim probably deserved it.  Tim&#039;s cohort certainly thought so: &quot;when you get the message, it&#039;s time to hang up the phone&quot;.  But even the Leary interview gave Tim a fair chance to defend himself.  Which he didn&#039;t at the time.  Ultimately, Tim would get the last laugh, being a high paid consultant in Japan (and making more money than Bill).  But Buckley will really get the last laugh, having affected society to a greater extent.  In the end, I&#039;m divided on which was both better and worse for us.  Leary had the greater economic impact (positive), while Buckley had the greater political impact (mixed).  But Leary&#039;s impact is indirect, while Buckley was always respected at the highest levels. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#039;ve felt closer to him now than ever.  I really do miss him.  Aside from the Panama Canal and the legalization of marijuana, I rarely agreed with him.  But I always valued his view.  Sadly, I don&#039;t see anyone replacing him.  But who really can? </p>
<p>As for your knowing more about both sides after watching the show, that was really the point, wasn&#039;t it?  He felt that his views were right, so it didn&#039;t harm him to allow an alternate view.  Aside from his interview with Timothy Leary, he was the paragon of politeness and civilized debate.  But Tim probably deserved it.  Tim&#039;s cohort certainly thought so: &quot;when you get the message, it&#039;s time to hang up the phone&quot;.  But even the Leary interview gave Tim a fair chance to defend himself.  Which he didn&#039;t at the time.  Ultimately, Tim would get the last laugh, being a high paid consultant in Japan (and making more money than Bill).  But Buckley will really get the last laugh, having affected society to a greater extent.  In the end, I&#039;m divided on which was both better and worse for us.  Leary had the greater economic impact (positive), while Buckley had the greater political impact (mixed).  But Leary&#039;s impact is indirect, while Buckley was always respected at the highest levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-624015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-624015</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t surprise me at all. If I may make a poor analogy (at least on my part), I see you much as the Michael Kinsley to my woefully inadequate Buckley here.  
 
One of the things I remember most about the show is that I almost always knew more about both sides of the discussion after the show than I did before. You reminded me of that with your comment. 
 
I can still recall the theme song to mind without any effort at all. I suppose it has made a larger impression on me than I had thought. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#039;t surprise me at all. If I may make a poor analogy (at least on my part), I see you much as the Michael Kinsley to my woefully inadequate Buckley here. </p>
<p>One of the things I remember most about the show is that I almost always knew more about both sides of the discussion after the show than I did before. You reminded me of that with your comment.</p>
<p>I can still recall the theme song to mind without any effort at all. I suppose it has made a larger impression on me than I had thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fostert</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/27/rip-william-f-buckley-jr/comment-page-1/#comment-623989</link>
		<dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4119#comment-623989</guid>
		<description>It might surprise you that I still defend my belief that that &quot;Firing Line&quot; was the best political talk show in history.  I probably remember watching 70% of the shows.  I was too young to remember the earlier shows, but I can assure you that I was on my mother&#039;s lap watching the show.  And she was a committed and activist liberal.  Her husband was a Rockefeller Republican, and her father-in-law was the local leader of the John Birch Society.  Often, they&#039;d watch Firing Line together and debate, politely of course, the topics discussed.  That Buckley&#039;s show could could manage to inspire civil debate among this crowd is truly amazing.  But it did. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might surprise you that I still defend my belief that that &quot;Firing Line&quot; was the best political talk show in history.  I probably remember watching 70% of the shows.  I was too young to remember the earlier shows, but I can assure you that I was on my mother&#039;s lap watching the show.  And she was a committed and activist liberal.  Her husband was a Rockefeller Republican, and her father-in-law was the local leader of the John Birch Society.  Often, they&#039;d watch Firing Line together and debate, politely of course, the topics discussed.  That Buckley&#039;s show could could manage to inspire civil debate among this crowd is truly amazing.  But it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 23:03:17 by W3 Total Cache -->
