<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Saying A Dumb Thing to Explain A Dumb Thing.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Neocon News » She said it TWICE and she meant it. Also, life doesn&#8217;t suck, so stop demanding that it does.</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-620571</link> <dc:creator>Neocon News » She said it TWICE and she meant it. Also, life doesn&#8217;t suck, so stop demanding that it does.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4081#comment-620571</guid> <description>[...] Malkin&#8217;s Column &#124; Captain&#8217;s Quarters &#124; silent E speaks &#124; Shock &amp; Blog &#124; The Sundries Shack &#124; Tai-Chi Policy &#124; Seeing Red AZ &#124; This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here &#124; Plains [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin&#8217;s Column | Captain&#8217;s Quarters | silent E speaks | Shock &amp; Blog | The Sundries Shack | Tai-Chi Policy | Seeing Red AZ | This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here | Plains [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: What Our Political Process Has Wrought : The Sundries Shack</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-620503</link> <dc:creator>What Our Political Process Has Wrought : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4081#comment-620503</guid> <description>[...] those of you whom, like Michelle Obama, who are &#8220;pretty cynical about the political process&#8221;, let me put things into perspective for [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those of you whom, like Michelle Obama, who are &#8220;pretty cynical about the political process&#8221;, let me put things into perspective for [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-620529</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4081#comment-620529</guid> <description>fostert - I don&#039;t think this was just a casual slip. What it tells me is that the Obamas are the sort of folks who believe deeply that America is a fundamentally-flawed country that occasionally does something good (like, say, voting for Barak). I don&#039;t want someone with that mindset in the White House. I want someone who sees this country as fundamentally good. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fostert &#8211; I don&#039;t think this was just a casual slip. What it tells me is that the Obamas are the sort of folks who believe deeply that America is a fundamentally-flawed country that occasionally does something good (like, say, voting for Barak). I don&#039;t want someone with that mindset in the White House. I want someone who sees this country as fundamentally good.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MarkJ</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-620508</link> <dc:creator>MarkJ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4081#comment-620508</guid> <description>&quot;I have no doubt our nation can survive the clumsy speech of Michelle Obama.&quot;
Yeah, but could a potential Obama presidency survive repeated first-magnitude gaffes by Madam Obama?  And how might Prince Charming react when the late-night shows start snickering about Michelle&#039;s latest verbal screw-up? Will he take the well-worn path of least resistance and call them racists? Gee, I wouldn&#039;t put it past him.
If or when Obama is elected, the first thing he should do is ensure Michelle is kept busy giving White House tours, hosting tea parties, and visiting day care centers--and keep her the hell away from any kind of politically responsible (or irresponsible) position. Otherwise, I&#039;ve got a sawbuck that says Michelle will rapidly morph into the &quot;Black Hillary Clinton&quot;...with political ambitions of her own.
Count on it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I have no doubt our nation can survive the clumsy speech of Michelle Obama.&quot;</p><p>Yeah, but could a potential Obama presidency survive repeated first-magnitude gaffes by Madam Obama?  And how might Prince Charming react when the late-night shows start snickering about Michelle&#039;s latest verbal screw-up? Will he take the well-worn path of least resistance and call them racists? Gee, I wouldn&#039;t put it past him.</p><p>If or when Obama is elected, the first thing he should do is ensure Michelle is kept busy giving White House tours, hosting tea parties, and visiting day care centers&#8211;and keep her the hell away from any kind of politically responsible (or irresponsible) position. Otherwise, I&#039;ve got a sawbuck that says Michelle will rapidly morph into the &quot;Black Hillary Clinton&quot;&#8230;with political ambitions of her own.</p><p>Count on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/20/saying-a-dumb-thing-to-explain-a-dumb-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-620493</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:39:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4081#comment-620493</guid> <description>Umm, for the Democratic primaries, this year really has been unusual.  Nearly every primary/ caucus this year has set an all-time turnout record.  The proportion of first-time voters is much higher than usual and is really only exceeded by 1972 when the voting age was lowered.  The 2004 presidential election may have had a big turnout, but this year will blow it away, with the added voters mostly going Dem.  While the primary season may be a little lackluster on the Republican side, the Democrats really do have an historic turnout this year.  And the Obamas are driving a lot of that excitement.  They have reason to be proud.
At least now I see the anti-Obama strategy: go after his wife like they did with the Clintons.  Of course, we all know how well the strategy worked the last time.  It turns out that the voters understand that First Lady isn&#039;t a very important office.  The office of First Lady has produced its fair share of wackos, lesbians, and drunks, yet the nation has survived them all.  I have no doubt our nation can survive the clumsy speech of Michelle Obama. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, for the Democratic primaries, this year really has been unusual.  Nearly every primary/ caucus this year has set an all-time turnout record.  The proportion of first-time voters is much higher than usual and is really only exceeded by 1972 when the voting age was lowered.  The 2004 presidential election may have had a big turnout, but this year will blow it away, with the added voters mostly going Dem.  While the primary season may be a little lackluster on the Republican side, the Democrats really do have an historic turnout this year.  And the Obamas are driving a lot of that excitement.  They have reason to be proud.</p><p>At least now I see the anti-Obama strategy: go after his wife like they did with the Clintons.  Of course, we all know how well the strategy worked the last time.  It turns out that the voters understand that First Lady isn&#039;t a very important office.  The office of First Lady has produced its fair share of wackos, lesbians, and drunks, yet the nation has survived them all.  I have no doubt our nation can survive the clumsy speech of Michelle Obama.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 06:05:33 by W3 Total Cache -->
