Comments on: McCain was Unacceptable in 2006 http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/07/mccain-was-unacceptable-in-2006/ Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004. Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Jimmiehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/07/mccain-was-unacceptable-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-617055 Jimmie Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:14:24 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4024#comment-617055 Perhaps. I still think it is a sound strategy, politically, if Clinton actually wins in November. I admit my reasoning may not be perfect but, to this point, no one has even tried to reason against it. Y'know, this might be worth talking about on your fancy radio show. If you ever have room for me and feel the need to have your ratings slide off into Congressional Approval Rating territory, I'd be honored. Perhaps. I still think it is a sound strategy, politically, if Clinton actually wins in November. I admit my reasoning may not be perfect but, to this point, no one has even tried to reason against it.

Y'know, this might be worth talking about on your fancy radio show. If you ever have room for me and feel the need to have your ratings slide off into Congressional Approval Rating territory, I'd be honored.

]]> By: Joel (No Pundit Intehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/07/mccain-was-unacceptable-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-617053 Joel (No Pundit Inte Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:11:40 +0000 http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4024#comment-617053 All of this derangement about McCain being the most electable boils down to one thing. "No Democrat in the White House!" This has become a sprint to the White House, rather than the marathon of upholding the principles Which are supposed to be the core of the party. There is a forest and trees analogy I can't seem to remember. All of this derangement about McCain being the most electable boils down to one thing. "No Democrat in the White House!"

This has become a sprint to the White House, rather than the marathon of upholding the principles Which are supposed to be the core of the party.

There is a forest and trees analogy I can't seem to remember.

]]>