<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s My Marker (Updated and Bumped)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Why Conservatives Might Want Clinton : The Sundries Shack</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-617505</link> <dc:creator>Why Conservatives Might Want Clinton : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:22:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-617505</guid> <description>[...] ease of reference, I want to link a couple other recent posts on the same topic. Here&#8217;s where I talk a bit about the &#8220;what about Iraq&#8221; argument (though it is has a lot more snark than this [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ease of reference, I want to link a couple other recent posts on the same topic. Here&#8217;s where I talk a bit about the &#8220;what about Iraq&#8221; argument (though it is has a lot more snark than this [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-617507</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-617507</guid> <description>redleg, I don&#039;t believe you can make that assertion as firmly as you have. I seem to have some evidence that Iraq may not be as imperiled as you would have me believe with President Clinton. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>redleg, I don&#039;t believe you can make that assertion as firmly as you have. I seem to have some evidence that Iraq may not be as imperiled as you would have me believe with President Clinton.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: redleg</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-617502</link> <dc:creator>redleg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-617502</guid> <description>We lose the war on terror if you don&#039;t support McCain.  He is very right in that arena as he is wrong on many others.  He is the nominee, and if you don&#039;t vote for him you get Hillary or Obama in 2008.  Your choice, your vote.
But I want to win this war, we can fix the domestic issues after we have won the war.  Iraq isn&#039;t the only place we are fighting, it is a global pandemic of Islamic extremism and letting your hurt feeling usher a Clinton back in the White House is a recipe for disaster.
So vote for Clinton in November if you wish, but if she wins I&#039;m dropping my military retirement paperwork as soon as I am eligible and I&#039;ll write a book on how the conservatives lost the war because McCain hurt their feelings. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We lose the war on terror if you don&#039;t support McCain.  He is very right in that arena as he is wrong on many others.  He is the nominee, and if you don&#039;t vote for him you get Hillary or Obama in 2008.  Your choice, your vote.</p><p>But I want to win this war, we can fix the domestic issues after we have won the war.  Iraq isn&#039;t the only place we are fighting, it is a global pandemic of Islamic extremism and letting your hurt feeling usher a Clinton back in the White House is a recipe for disaster.</p><p>So vote for Clinton in November if you wish, but if she wins I&#039;m dropping my military retirement paperwork as soon as I am eligible and I&#039;ll write a book on how the conservatives lost the war because McCain hurt their feelings.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Other McCain : The Sundries Shack</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-616865</link> <dc:creator>The Other McCain : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:46:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-616865</guid> <description>[...] choices are not pleasant. I&#8217;ll probably write more on the choice and expand on this post perhaps this evening. To be quite frank, I&#8217;m carrying around my own little storm cloud and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] choices are not pleasant. I&#8217;ll probably write more on the choice and expand on this post perhaps this evening. To be quite frank, I&#8217;m carrying around my own little storm cloud and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Beth</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-616948</link> <dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:19:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-616948</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don&#8217;t know&#8230;the election may be reversible in 2012, but the SCOTUS appointees will affect us for the next 20-40 years. Are you willing to risk that?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Exactly.
And not just that.  Over the last six-plus years, we haven&#039;t had to sacrifice a single thing unless we&#039;ve worn a uniform.  I REFUSE to leave the men and women who have sacrificed *everything* (while America is navel-gazing at  keyboards) at the mercy of a military-hating HRC or a quasi-socialist empty-suit pacifist (Obamessiah).  To do anything else would be the most supremely selfish and short-sighted act imaginable in the election.
&lt;i&gt;McCain could be another which would not elect strong judges.&lt;/i&gt;
Tell that to Ted Olson, Steven Calabresi, and Miguel Estrada.
Tell that to Robert Bork, whom McCain strongly defended.
Tell that to David Souter, in whom McCain was bitterly disappointed because he felt Souter was only nominated in order to avoid &quot;another bloodbath&quot; like there was with Bork.
Go ahead, tell them.  You know better than they do, right? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don&rsquo;t know&hellip;the election may be reversible in 2012, but the SCOTUS appointees will affect us for the next 20-40 years. Are you willing to risk that?</p></blockquote><p>Exactly.</p><p>And not just that.  Over the last six-plus years, we haven&#039;t had to sacrifice a single thing unless we&#039;ve worn a uniform.  I REFUSE to leave the men and women who have sacrificed *everything* (while America is navel-gazing at  keyboards) at the mercy of a military-hating HRC or a quasi-socialist empty-suit pacifist (Obamessiah).  To do anything else would be the most supremely selfish and short-sighted act imaginable in the election.</p><p><i>McCain could be another which would not elect strong judges.</i></p><p>Tell that to Ted Olson, Steven Calabresi, and Miguel Estrada.</p><p>Tell that to Robert Bork, whom McCain strongly defended.</p><p>Tell that to David Souter, in whom McCain was bitterly disappointed because he felt Souter was only nominated in order to avoid &quot;another bloodbath&quot; like there was with Bork.</p><p>Go ahead, tell them.  You know better than they do, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: drWNC</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-616887</link> <dc:creator>drWNC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-616887</guid> <description>Dark storm clouds are the weather coverage today in WNC, but it&#039;s also the way I feel about the up coming election.
May I change my mind?  Possibly, but right now a man with principles I initially respected is no longer in the race (FT).  The man who is not a strong conservative in all aspects but should be fiscally sound did not perform well on Tuesday.
Finally we are down to McCain, and as a 23 or so year veteran of washington who has made a habit of siding with liberal policies wants my vote.
The War, The Supreme Court, a socialist in the whithouse, or 4 to 8 more years of clinton.
I have reconciled with myself that it is time to stand on principle, live with the concequences and TRUST that this United states will be able to recover because of the american spirit no matter what happens in Washington over the next 4 years.  We survived 1976-1980, as well as the early 60s. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark storm clouds are the weather coverage today in WNC, but it&#039;s also the way I feel about the up coming election.</p><p>May I change my mind?  Possibly, but right now a man with principles I initially respected is no longer in the race (FT).  The man who is not a strong conservative in all aspects but should be fiscally sound did not perform well on Tuesday.</p><p>Finally we are down to McCain, and as a 23 or so year veteran of washington who has made a habit of siding with liberal policies wants my vote.</p><p>The War, The Supreme Court, a socialist in the whithouse, or 4 to 8 more years of clinton.</p><p>I have reconciled with myself that it is time to stand on principle, live with the concequences and TRUST that this United states will be able to recover because of the american spirit no matter what happens in Washington over the next 4 years.  We survived 1976-1980, as well as the early 60s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: drWNC</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-616860</link> <dc:creator>drWNC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-616860</guid> <description>I keep hearing about the court, and while it is a valid concern is it just talk.
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas
Samual Alito
4-consistent judges who will hold to the constitution.
-----------------------------------------
John Stevens-appointed by Ford: could retire?
Anthony Kennedy-appointed by Reagan; should remain on the court next 4 to 8 years
David Souter-appointed by Bush 1 should remain on court next 4 to 8 years
Ruth Ginsburg-appointed by Clinton: could retire
Stephen Breyer-appointed by clinton, should remain for 4 to 8 more years
---------------------------------------------
Of the 5 justices listed directly above 3 were selected by republican presidents.  Most likely 2 will retire in the next 4 years which will not effect the makeup of the court significantly.  Note, with strong previous conservative candidates it should be a non-issue this election cycle, McCain could be another which would not elect strong judges.  G. Bush did an excellent job with his candidates. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing about the court, and while it is a valid concern is it just talk.</p><p>John Roberts</p><p>Antonin Scalia</p><p>Clarence Thomas</p><p>Samual Alito</p><p>4-consistent judges who will hold to the constitution.</p><p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p><p>John Stevens-appointed by Ford: could retire?</p><p>Anthony Kennedy-appointed by Reagan; should remain on the court next 4 to 8 years</p><p>David Souter-appointed by Bush 1 should remain on court next 4 to 8 years</p><p>Ruth Ginsburg-appointed by Clinton: could retire</p><p>Stephen Breyer-appointed by clinton, should remain for 4 to 8 more years</p><p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p><p>Of the 5 justices listed directly above 3 were selected by republican presidents.  Most likely 2 will retire in the next 4 years which will not effect the makeup of the court significantly.  Note, with strong previous conservative candidates it should be a non-issue this election cycle, McCain could be another which would not elect strong judges.  G. Bush did an excellent job with his candidates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Chief</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/06/heres-my-marker/comment-page-1/#comment-616859</link> <dc:creator>The Chief</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:04:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4012#comment-616859</guid> <description>Throwing away my vote on the Libertarians if it comes to that (as it appears it almost certainly will).  The party is insane on the border and national defense but I agree with them on almost every other principle, and I just can&#039;t make myself to choose between a Douche and a Turd, as the South Park guys would put it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throwing away my vote on the Libertarians if it comes to that (as it appears it almost certainly will).  The party is insane on the border and national defense but I agree with them on almost every other principle, and I just can&#039;t make myself to choose between a Douche and a Turd, as the South Park guys would put it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 05:28:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
