<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Taking the Romney Challenge</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616785</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:07:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616785</guid> <description>No, Huckabee mostly gets the evangelical populists.  The ultraconservatives are a mix of neoconservative foreign policy nerds (going for Romney) and Apocalyptical maniacs (split between Huckabee, McCain, and Romney).
But the Apocalyptical maniacs are small in number (although they are still the largest fundamentalist movement of any religion in the world), and they can&#039;t agree on who will fulfill the prophecies of the Book of Revelation.  So, fortunately for the rest of us, they aren&#039;t moving their plan forward.  You have to wonder about people who wish for the destruction of the world.  And you certainly don&#039;t want to give them access to nuclear weapons.  We&#039;ve come far too close to that already.
The neoconservative nerds have, unfortunately,  been running our foreign policy for years.  Strangely, McCain fully agrees with most of their policies (he&#039;s been on the forefront, really), but they hate him anyway.  But he didn&#039;t follow the Party Line on torture, immigration and ethics, so he needs to be eliminated.  How very Soviet.
But the good news is that neither of these classes of people seems to have much influence anymore.  The way I see it, the world will be at least a little bit better when the next president takes office. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Huckabee mostly gets the evangelical populists.  The ultraconservatives are a mix of neoconservative foreign policy nerds (going for Romney) and Apocalyptical maniacs (split between Huckabee, McCain, and Romney).</p><p>But the Apocalyptical maniacs are small in number (although they are still the largest fundamentalist movement of any religion in the world), and they can&#039;t agree on who will fulfill the prophecies of the Book of Revelation.  So, fortunately for the rest of us, they aren&#039;t moving their plan forward.  You have to wonder about people who wish for the destruction of the world.  And you certainly don&#039;t want to give them access to nuclear weapons.  We&#039;ve come far too close to that already.</p><p>The neoconservative nerds have, unfortunately,  been running our foreign policy for years.  Strangely, McCain fully agrees with most of their policies (he&#039;s been on the forefront, really), but they hate him anyway.  But he didn&#039;t follow the Party Line on torture, immigration and ethics, so he needs to be eliminated.  How very Soviet.</p><p>But the good news is that neither of these classes of people seems to have much influence anymore.  The way I see it, the world will be at least a little bit better when the next president takes office.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616764</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:04:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616764</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure who you&#039;re considering ultraconservative, but from my point of view, those folks are going for Huckabee. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure who you&#039;re considering ultraconservative, but from my point of view, those folks are going for Huckabee.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616762</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616762</guid> <description>Oh that&#039;s right, Romney can win where he was governor, too.  But there aren&#039;t many of those left now, are there? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh that&#039;s right, Romney can win where he was governor, too.  But there aren&#039;t many of those left now, are there?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616761</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616761</guid> <description>Oh, I don&#039;t know.  Mitt just lost big in California, but won in Colorado.  Both are proportional, but California awards some extra delegates (11) for winning the state.  And California is a much larger state.  And Romney&#039;s getting crushed almost everywhere else.  On top of that, Romney&#039;s having a &quot;frank&quot; talk with his staff and has canceled some campaign stops tomorrow.  Romney had a really bad day.
But it&#039;s not over yet, it could get worse.  So far Romney has won states with significant Mormon populations or where his dad was governor.  His dad was only governor of one state, and only Idaho and Washington (okay, maybe Oregon) are left with substantial Mormon populations.  If he doesn&#039;t find a new constituency in the next week, he&#039;s done.
It doesn&#039;t seem that the ultraconservative vote is having much of an effect.  The conservative vote is, but it&#039;s going for McCain.  Not surprising, as he has the most consistent conservative record.  But he&#039;s not a team player.  But maybe the  voters don&#039;t want a team player anymore.  Maybe they want a leader.  Or maybe they just don&#039;t want a CEO.  Either way, they don&#039;t want Romney.  Face it, if you don&#039;t want McCain, you need to work for a brokered convention.  It&#039;s the only thing in reach now. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I don&#039;t know.  Mitt just lost big in California, but won in Colorado.  Both are proportional, but California awards some extra delegates (11) for winning the state.  And California is a much larger state.  And Romney&#039;s getting crushed almost everywhere else.  On top of that, Romney&#039;s having a &quot;frank&quot; talk with his staff and has canceled some campaign stops tomorrow.  Romney had a really bad day.</p><p>But it&#039;s not over yet, it could get worse.  So far Romney has won states with significant Mormon populations or where his dad was governor.  His dad was only governor of one state, and only Idaho and Washington (okay, maybe Oregon) are left with substantial Mormon populations.  If he doesn&#039;t find a new constituency in the next week, he&#039;s done.</p><p>It doesn&#039;t seem that the ultraconservative vote is having much of an effect.  The conservative vote is, but it&#039;s going for McCain.  Not surprising, as he has the most consistent conservative record.  But he&#039;s not a team player.  But maybe the  voters don&#039;t want a team player anymore.  Maybe they want a leader.  Or maybe they just don&#039;t want a CEO.  Either way, they don&#039;t want Romney.  Face it, if you don&#039;t want McCain, you need to work for a brokered convention.  It&#039;s the only thing in reach now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616749</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:22:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616749</guid> <description>Even two against one they couldn&#039;t put Mitt away. That&#039;s nothing but good news for him. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even two against one they couldn&#039;t put Mitt away. That&#039;s nothing but good news for him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616742</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616742</guid> <description>Things aren&#039;t looking too good for Romney.  He might not get very many more delegates than Huckabee.  But McCain doesn&#039;t look as strong as predicted.  He won&#039;t be coranated tonight. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things aren&#039;t looking too good for Romney.  He might not get very many more delegates than Huckabee.  But McCain doesn&#039;t look as strong as predicted.  He won&#039;t be coranated tonight.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fostert</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616664</link> <dc:creator>fostert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:02:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616664</guid> <description>Just an update, Huckabee just won West Virginia because McCain&#039;s supporters all went for Huckabee on the second ballot.  No doubt McCain is looking for a quid pro quo at the end of the primaries.  He&#039;ll probably get it, but it&#039;s not a guarantee.  Party bigwigs will try very hard to influence Huck&#039;s decision.  But what is a guarantee is that McCain wins easily if Huckabee drops out tonight.  But I doubt he will.  In the end, it doesn&#039;t look good for Romney. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update, Huckabee just won West Virginia because McCain&#039;s supporters all went for Huckabee on the second ballot.  No doubt McCain is looking for a quid pro quo at the end of the primaries.  He&#039;ll probably get it, but it&#039;s not a guarantee.  Party bigwigs will try very hard to influence Huck&#039;s decision.  But what is a guarantee is that McCain wins easily if Huckabee drops out tonight.  But I doubt he will.  In the end, it doesn&#039;t look good for Romney.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/02/04/taking-the-romney-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-616641</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:16:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=4001#comment-616641</guid> <description>Oh, there&#039;s no way he&#039;d support Romney. he&#039;s already overtly backing everything McCain does right now. We&#039;ve already seen where he called McCain and handed new Hampshire off to him. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#039;s no way he&#039;d support Romney. he&#039;s already overtly backing everything McCain does right now. We&#039;ve already seen where he called McCain and handed new Hampshire off to him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 05:27:27 by W3 Total Cache -->
