<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Obama Routs Clinton in SC</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/01/27/obama-routs-clinton-in-sc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/01/27/obama-routs-clinton-in-sc/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: suek</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/01/27/obama-routs-clinton-in-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-614263</link> <dc:creator>suek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3960#comment-614263</guid> <description>There&#039;s a blog - SuitablyFlip - that has a table with the Republican candidates tallies on it.  Romney has twice the delegates that McCain has, although obviously it&#039;s still early.  Nevertheless, the reason I mention this is because you keep reading that McCain is the leading candidate.  At this point, he&#039;s not, but they&#039;re saying so.  I haven&#039;t looked for a tally on the Dems.  I have no idea how the delegates total so far - but just because the MSM touts one or the other as the &quot;leading&quot; candidate, doesn&#039;t make it so. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a blog &#8211; SuitablyFlip &#8211; that has a table with the Republican candidates tallies on it.  Romney has twice the delegates that McCain has, although obviously it&#039;s still early.  Nevertheless, the reason I mention this is because you keep reading that McCain is the leading candidate.  At this point, he&#039;s not, but they&#039;re saying so.  I haven&#039;t looked for a tally on the Dems.  I have no idea how the delegates total so far &#8211; but just because the MSM touts one or the other as the &quot;leading&quot; candidate, doesn&#039;t make it so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luke Vargas</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/01/27/obama-routs-clinton-in-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-614135</link> <dc:creator>Luke Vargas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3960#comment-614135</guid> <description>Great breakdown of tonight&#039;s results. As you point out, there&#039;s a big voting block that won&#039;t go for Obama if he doesn&#039;t have any substantial positions on key issues in the coming weeks. The current economic situation presents him an interesting opportunity to develop a plan at the same time as Hillary Clinton and see how voters react. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great breakdown of tonight&#039;s results. As you point out, there&#039;s a big voting block that won&#039;t go for Obama if he doesn&#039;t have any substantial positions on key issues in the coming weeks. The current economic situation presents him an interesting opportunity to develop a plan at the same time as Hillary Clinton and see how voters react.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-24 05:13:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
