I’m right, aren’t I?

First, I would like to say it takes a lot of guts to have a site like the one you have. I am a skeptic when it comes to things posted on the internet. I applaud Jimmie at bringing things to light because if he did not do it who would? Yet I do have some concerns. I wrote the following last night hoping it would be posted but there seemed to be some problems. I have shortened my response to only show my concerns:

I do like the first post. There are a lot of quotes, but there is still minimal substance and fact. Why is this first article lacking footnotes or something to say of the origin of these quotes? It could have been very revealing and believable. Yet the person who took all this time (I assume multiple hours if not several days) to investigate and write it could not take the time to put in footnotes? How am I supposed to know if they are real or made up? I am not trying to be difficult. Nobody takes that much time without substantiating their claims. The way things were written they could be considered more like slander. I do like the third article also. It is the one you quoted. I thought I wrote would maybe calm your fears of Paul by explaining as best I could his reasoning, yet your rebuttals were trival. I agree with you that the average person, if they are reasonable would take the links at face value. The problem is that I do consider the average person as reasonable but nowhere near analytical enough to question the authors. That is why I have questioned your quotes and links.

Take Care

Thanks (and thanks for this thread because I got at least ME thinking!)

Spin it however you like, Ron Paul backed a bigoted, anti-Semitic newsletter for a good two decades and made plenty of cash off of it.

End of discussion.

I don't really see how my feelings have anything to do with this subject. If you want to counterpoint something that I have written then please do. I did it for you, yet your rebuttal was farcical. Please use some objectivity in what you write so we can have a worthwhile discussion. Everything that I have written was based on fact. Examples from my previous statement: the devaluation of the dollar, our involvement in the Middle East (which ultimately angered enough Muslims to come and blow up our World Trade Center-as written by our own CIA), our taking over of Iraq which has caused over an estimated 100,000 people (a reported fact). These of course are all things Ron Paul has been trying to change so we don't keep going down the same path. If you were able to show me some proof beyond your hearsay and the one newsletter pertaining to the LA riots that CNN brought up with Ron, I would congratulate you on enlightening me. The fact that CNN has not broached the subject any further should be indicative that there is nothing more to broach. Don't talk to me about feelings. I sure hope you don't vote based on feelings, but I got a feeling you do and so do many other people. Unfortunately, we end up with the worst candidates and therefore continue to support and create a larger kakistocracy at local, state, and federal levels. (the last two statements were opinion based on fact)