"What I said was," [something like]let me find that page… Saying the CIA did not tell HER about… when it could be that she sent a staffer to the meeting does nothing to say she should have known (or did know) about waterboarding.

This reminds me of "I did not have (activity) with…"

If it was SO clear that it was never said, her statements would not be contradictory. In effect, there would be no "I never knew" to "it was mentioned" to "never told me." If it was so clear and "obvious," I don't think a prepared statement would need to be used to make sure she did not "overstep" what she should be saying…

Of course, I have NO idea who said what to whom. However, I don't know that anyone is going to release confidential CIA/Congressional documents to settle this matter.

Either way, I think Pelosi lost credibility (at least she did with me).

If they didn’t make the statements themselves, they tacitly approved them.

The title stands.

OK, well, the title reads "Said Interrogators Could Do More", which to me, would imply that a Democrat actually said something to that effect. While it may turn out to be true, that detail isn't there in this WaPo piece.

The title stands.

Democrats knew and they thought it didn’t go far enough.

I didn't see that in the article. I saw this:

Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

Notice that it didn't specify if those lawmakers were Democrats or Republicans. I suggest that you revise your title for this post.