<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not That They&#8217;re Biased or Anything&#8230;Version 2.0!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2007/10/07/not-that-theyre-biased-or-anythingversion-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2007/10/07/not-that-theyre-biased-or-anythingversion-20/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Question the Story Placement : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2007/10/07/not-that-theyre-biased-or-anythingversion-20/comment-page-1/#comment-573548</link>
		<dc:creator>I Question the Story Placement : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3395#comment-573548</guid>
		<description>[...] You might recall that earlier this month,the Washington Post buried a story about lower US casualties in Iraq on Page A14. When the Post&#8217;s Howard Kurtz asked a couple reporters why that would be so when higher casualties are routinely front-page news, we were told that it really wasn&#8217;t a trend and who could trust the military&#8217;s numbers anyhow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You might recall that earlier this month,the Washington Post buried a story about lower US casualties in Iraq on Page A14. When the Post&#8217;s Howard Kurtz asked a couple reporters why that would be so when higher casualties are routinely front-page news, we were told that it really wasn&#8217;t a trend and who could trust the military&#8217;s numbers anyhow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2007/10/07/not-that-theyre-biased-or-anythingversion-20/comment-page-1/#comment-556800</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3395#comment-556800</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sundries Shack: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sundries Shack: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 23:45:51 by W3 Total Cache -->
