What of the Left and Its Morality?
Here’s a little commentary about our very own leftists, from a wise and observant man.
“Realism”, then, means nothing other than trading off our enemies’ interests in one place for our own assumed advantage elsewhere. (e.g., stop the Iranian IED supply in southern Iraq and we will lay off UN sanctions; close the Syrian border with Iraq, and Assad can creep back into Lebanon, etc.). All that is a fair, not an exaggerated, description of realism as we have known it. Syria was once invited into the first Gulf War coalition by our hands-off promises about its role in Lebanon. Kurds and Shiites were once let go in 1991 on promises to the Gulf monarchies to keep the old regional dictatorial order.
All this is hardly new to readers, but what is novel is the sudden liberal embrace of it. Why does the Democratic leadership seem to welcome in the thinking of a James Baker or Brent Scowcroft, especially since it once demonized realism, most notably the circumstances around the first Gulf War or the supposed Bush I failure to stop the genocide in the Balkans? Is it just petty spite at seeing GWB’s own turn on him?
Or is it a deeper malaise that modern liberal internationalism is neither liberal nor international. Lacking any real belief that the United States, now or in its past, has been a continual force for good, the contemporary Left hardly wants the rest of the world to suffer the American malaise of racism, sexism, homophobia, environmental degradation, and consumerism. That self-doubt is buttressed by the idea as well that confrontation is always bad, that evil does not really exist, but is a construct we create for misunderstanding, that the world’s ills are remedied by reason and dialogue.
In essence, the progressive Leftist is often affluent, insulated from the savagery about him by his material largess, and empathizes with those who are antithetical to the very forces that made him free, secure, and prosperous—as a way to assuage the guilt, at very little cost, of his own blessedness.
His post moves from Iraq and Iran to Darfur and wonders where the left’s concern for human rights has suddenly gone. It’s worth reading, if for no other reason than to get a taste of a keen mind at work.
UPDATE: It would help me to include the link, now wouldn’t it? Thanks to EricH for catching my mistake!
No related posts.
Category: Our Foreign Policy


















Tsk, tsk, Jimmie; you've neglected both the link, and the actual attribution. Your poor readers can't read the whole thing without a link, and they can't google for the author without knowing who he is….
D'oh!
It's fixed now. Late-posting sometimes is an adventure.
Oh, also, there shouldn't be an apostrophe in the title. The apostrophe, as you're probably aware, is omitted in the possessive form, and only used in the contraction of "it is"…As in "It's Awards Time Again!", if I can borrow another of your titles for an example of correct usage.