<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Kerry&#8217;s Ridiculous Defense.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Terry Ott</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294542</link> <dc:creator>Terry Ott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:20:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294542</guid> <description>Gumbo,
Looking at the Kerry website the other day, he is claiming that no one has done more campaigning for Democrat candidates, no one has raised more money for campaigns, he&#039;s been everywhere talking to everyone, etc. etc.
So, he IS a significant factor in this 2006 election, and presumably those for whom he is campaigning are hoping some of his popularity or status (or who knows what?) will serve them well in their own campaigns.  In a sense he is running for those who are running --- and at the same time trying to build back his support for a potential POTUS run in &#039;08.  So, he is a candidate, he is a spokesman for the party, he is the party&#039;s most recent national candidate for high office.
I have never understood what he has going for him to show up in such key positions, but SOMEBODY (a lot of somebodies, actually) musf find something to like about him and those folks are pulling for him to make another run.  As long as he is in this kind of position and role, what he says is noteworthy, and when what he says is crappy that also rubs off on those he is connected with.  Even if only in his own mind he is a (if not THE) headliner in the Party, he&#039;s fair game.  And he just keeps putting that target on his back for reasons that a team of shrinks might be able to explain.  I sure cannot. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gumbo,</p><p>Looking at the Kerry website the other day, he is claiming that no one has done more campaigning for Democrat candidates, no one has raised more money for campaigns, he&#039;s been everywhere talking to everyone, etc. etc.</p><p>So, he IS a significant factor in this 2006 election, and presumably those for whom he is campaigning are hoping some of his popularity or status (or who knows what?) will serve them well in their own campaigns.  In a sense he is running for those who are running &#8212; and at the same time trying to build back his support for a potential POTUS run in &#039;08.  So, he is a candidate, he is a spokesman for the party, he is the party&#039;s most recent national candidate for high office.</p><p>I have never understood what he has going for him to show up in such key positions, but SOMEBODY (a lot of somebodies, actually) musf find something to like about him and those folks are pulling for him to make another run.  As long as he is in this kind of position and role, what he says is noteworthy, and when what he says is crappy that also rubs off on those he is connected with.  Even if only in his own mind he is a (if not THE) headliner in the Party, he&#039;s fair game.  And he just keeps putting that target on his back for reasons that a team of shrinks might be able to explain.  I sure cannot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gumbo_Diplomacy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294494</link> <dc:creator>Gumbo_Diplomacy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:09:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294494</guid> <description>The only mind control going on is with the legions of conservatives who feign outrage all at once when directed to do so by the Republican National Committee.  It&#8217;s like a junior high school passion play, full of noise and fury and signifying nothing other than your desperation to drum up an issue&#8212;any issue&#8212;to distract people from real issues.  Please spare us your phony melodrama. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only mind control going on is with the legions of conservatives who feign outrage all at once when directed to do so by the Republican National Committee.  It&rsquo;s like a junior high school passion play, full of noise and fury and signifying nothing other than your desperation to drum up an issue&mdash;any issue&mdash;to distract people from real issues.  Please spare us your phony melodrama.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294489</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294489</guid> <description>Riiiiiight, Gumbo.
Because Karl Rove and his Mind Control Satellites told John Kerry to insult our soldiers. Of course. You figured it out. Congratulations. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riiiiiight, Gumbo.</p><p>Because Karl Rove and his Mind Control Satellites told John Kerry to insult our soldiers. Of course. You figured it out. Congratulations.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gumbo_Diplomacy</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294487</link> <dc:creator>Gumbo_Diplomacy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294487</guid> <description>Considering that Kerry isn&#8217;t up for reelection this year and that his comments&#8212;however poorly stated they may have been&#8212;don&#8217;t relate to any real issue, I have to conclude that this episode is a classic case of Rovian politics at its most cynical and pointless.  If Republicans are forced to manifacture a controversy over such an insignificant non-event, it only speaks to how desperate they are to create any diversion from their own corruption and mismanagement. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that Kerry isn&rsquo;t up for reelection this year and that his comments&mdash;however poorly stated they may have been&mdash;don&rsquo;t relate to any real issue, I have to conclude that this episode is a classic case of Rovian politics at its most cynical and pointless.  If Republicans are forced to manifacture a controversy over such an insignificant non-event, it only speaks to how desperate they are to create any diversion from their own corruption and mismanagement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294484</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294484</guid> <description>Great comments John M. - For all those interested, see the way the NY Times covered this story!!! If you read on-line you have to hunt for it and I&#039;m sure the same is true for the hard copy. They blame BUSH and his failed policy in Iraqi. No responsiblity is placed on CAREY.Apparently,the DNC is alive and well operating for the paper. I swear! FYI please see the Times. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments John M. &#8211; For all those interested, see the way the NY Times covered this story!!! If you read on-line you have to hunt for it and I&#039;m sure the same is true for the hard copy. They blame BUSH and his failed policy in Iraqi. No responsiblity is placed on CAREY.Apparently,the DNC is alive and well operating for the paper. I swear! FYI please see the Times.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John M.</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294446</link> <dc:creator>John M.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294446</guid> <description>I think that Kerry said exactly
what he wanted to say, and he WAS
meaning to say - &quot;finish college,
or you&#039;ll end up as a dumb solider.&quot;
Kerry just wildly miscalculated the
effect of these statements. He
probably talks this way in his
high powered and high money political
and social circles, so this was just
John Kerry being John Kerry.
It&#039;s unfortunate for John Kerry
and the Democratic party, who
sometimes need to get off of
their high horses and moneyed
fairy land lives. Humility and
understanding of ordinary Americans
seems to be much more a part of the
Republican party, despite the
Democrats&#039; apparent but false
compassion show in their
constant pandering speeches to
the poor, to unions, to illegal
immigrants, and others who are easily
influenced by flowery speakers.
Thanks John Kerry for the awesome
October surprise. Maybe you are
secretly a Karl Rove operative.
Brilliant !! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Kerry said exactly</p><p> what he wanted to say, and he WAS</p><p> meaning to say &#8211; &quot;finish college,</p><p> or you&#039;ll end up as a dumb solider.&quot;</p><p> Kerry just wildly miscalculated the</p><p> effect of these statements. He</p><p> probably talks this way in his</p><p> high powered and high money political</p><p> and social circles, so this was just</p><p> John Kerry being John Kerry.</p><p> It&#039;s unfortunate for John Kerry</p><p> and the Democratic party, who</p><p> sometimes need to get off of</p><p> their high horses and moneyed</p><p> fairy land lives. Humility and</p><p> understanding of ordinary Americans</p><p> seems to be much more a part of the</p><p> Republican party, despite the</p><p> Democrats&#039; apparent but false</p><p> compassion show in their</p><p> constant pandering speeches to</p><p> the poor, to unions, to illegal</p><p> immigrants, and others who are easily</p><p> influenced by flowery speakers.</p><p> Thanks John Kerry for the awesome</p><p> October surprise. Maybe you are</p><p> secretly a Karl Rove operative.</p><p> Brilliant !!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terry Ott</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294417</link> <dc:creator>Terry Ott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:09:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294417</guid> <description>The term &quot;limosine liberal&quot; is popular, but here we have a limosine soldier.  He&#039;ll seem to &quot;support the military&quot; as long as he is spending money (ours) to do it from Capitol Hill, but he is &quot;above them&quot; pyschologically.  And that sentiment is what came out of his mouth, whether he intended it that way or not.
As for his comment,  &quot;if anyone thinks a veteran would criticize the more than 140,000 heroes serving in Iraq and not the president who got us stuck there, they&#8217;re crazy&quot; ... well, that&#039;s kind of like the other flawed Senator from MA bloviating on morality and character. Wasn&#039;t it John Kerry who turned on fellow combatants in Nam, testifying to their inhumane actions?  Yes, a certain veteran WOULD do that apparently.  Throwing his medals away, before he decided he hadn&#039;t --- another distancing of himself from the military and dissing it for all to see.
I think the man has a self-destructive thing going on.  Someone ought to take him to a football game and show him how, when you have a lead late in the game, you do not want to throw back across the middle into defenders or punt the ball on a line to the opponents&#039; return man.  I guess windsurfers need some coaching on stuff like that.
&quot;Tone deaf&quot; is a term that&#039;s been applied to Mr. Kerry.  I think he is totally deaf to others&#039; sensitivities, and dumb as well. I mean, dumb as in &quot;Dumb and Dumber&quot;. not dumb as is cannot speak.  Oh, yeah, he can speak all right.  He&#039;ll be talking his way to oblivion. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &quot;limosine liberal&quot; is popular, but here we have a limosine soldier.  He&#039;ll seem to &quot;support the military&quot; as long as he is spending money (ours) to do it from Capitol Hill, but he is &quot;above them&quot; pyschologically.  And that sentiment is what came out of his mouth, whether he intended it that way or not.</p><p>As for his comment,  &quot;if anyone thinks a veteran would criticize the more than 140,000 heroes serving in Iraq and not the president who got us stuck there, they&rsquo;re crazy&quot; &#8230; well, that&#039;s kind of like the other flawed Senator from MA bloviating on morality and character. Wasn&#039;t it John Kerry who turned on fellow combatants in Nam, testifying to their inhumane actions?  Yes, a certain veteran WOULD do that apparently.  Throwing his medals away, before he decided he hadn&#039;t &#8212; another distancing of himself from the military and dissing it for all to see.</p><p>I think the man has a self-destructive thing going on.  Someone ought to take him to a football game and show him how, when you have a lead late in the game, you do not want to throw back across the middle into defenders or punt the ball on a line to the opponents&#039; return man.  I guess windsurfers need some coaching on stuff like that.</p><p>&quot;Tone deaf&quot; is a term that&#039;s been applied to Mr. Kerry.  I think he is totally deaf to others&#039; sensitivities, and dumb as well. I mean, dumb as in &quot;Dumb and Dumber&quot;. not dumb as is cannot speak.  Oh, yeah, he can speak all right.  He&#039;ll be talking his way to oblivion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/11/01/kerrys-ridiculous-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-294413</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:01:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2768#comment-294413</guid> <description>I THINK CAREYS&#039; defense of his statement is intellectually indefensable. How does one get any connection to a Joke about George Bush from what his original statement was??? Someone tell me. He should be a MAN about it and say I AM Sory- If he is.He may be so arrogant that he will not ! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK CAREYS&#039; defense of his statement is intellectually indefensable. How does one get any connection to a Joke about George Bush from what his original statement was??? Someone tell me. He should be a MAN about it and say I AM Sory- If he is.He may be so arrogant that he will not !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-23 01:41:27 by W3 Total Cache -->
